Quantifying the Presence of Ancient Greek and Latin Classics in Early Modern Britain

This paper explores the reception of classical works in Early Modern Britain during the hand press era, between the 1470s and 1790s. It investigates canon formation, knowledge transmission, and the integration of digital archives in quantitative book history. The study quantitatively maps changing perceptions of the classical canon across time, offering a panoramic view of 'shifting canons'. The analysis is based on three data archives: the English Short Title Catalogue (ESTC), Early English Books Online (EEBO), and Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO). We conclude that we can observe a “canonization” of the set of classical authors printed in Early Modern England, which is reflected in a significant loss of diversity in publications, despite a general increase of the publication of classical works. Preferences also shift, with ancient Greek authors of the early centuries gaining significantly more space in the 18th century. This finding however is balanced by the observation that the circulation of Ancient Greek editions in the original language does not increase during this time. This multidimensional approach contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the reception of Classics in Early Modern Britain, shedding light on cultural and intellectual transformations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Analytics
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.128008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Presence of Ancient Greek and Latin Classics in Early Modern Britain

Jukka Suomela, Toon Van Hal, Margherita Fantoli, Mikko Tolonen et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cultural Analytics
Historical and Literary Studies
11.35
article

Quantifying the Presence of Ancient Greek and Latin Classics in Early Modern Britain

Jukka Suomela, Toon Van Hal, Margherita Fantoli, Mikko Tolonen, Mark Depauw, Lari Virkki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the reception of classical works in Early Modern Britain during the hand press era, between the 1470s and 1790s. It investigates canon formation, knowledge transmission, and the integration of digital archives in quantitative book history. The study quantitatively maps changing perceptions of the classical canon across time, offering a panoramic view of 'shifting canons'. The analysis is based on three data archives: the English Short Title Catalogue (ESTC), Early English Books Online (EEBO), and Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO). We conclude that we can observe a “canonization” of the set of classical authors printed in Early Modern England, which is reflected in a significant loss of diversity in publications, despite a general increase of the publication of classical works. Preferences also shift, with ancient Greek authors of the early centuries gaining significantly more space in the 18th century. This finding however is balanced by the observation that the circulation of Ancient Greek editions in the original language does not increase during this time. This multidimensional approach contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the reception of Classics in Early Modern Britain, shedding light on cultural and intellectual transformations.

Journal of Cultural AnalyticsVol. 10(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), Aalto University (FI), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical and Literary Studies
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.