Breaking Away From AI: The Ontological and Ethical Evolution of Machine Learning

Machine Learning (ML) has historically been associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) but has developed into an independent discipline. This paper argues for the ontological independence of ML, driven by its unique methodologies, applications, and ethical considerations. A bibliometric analysis reveals that ML research output (494,572 publications from 2017–2023) surpasses AI (283,762 publications) by 74%, reflecting its rapid growth and specialization. Unlike AI’s pursuit of general intelligence and symbolic reasoning, ML focuses on data-driven performance optimization, with impactful applications in computer vision, natural language processing (NLP), and autonomous systems. The study highlights ethical challenges—such as addressing algorithmic bias (50 occurrences), fairness (2,778 publications), and environmental sustainability (283 related works)—which emphasize the need for dedicated ethical frameworks tailored to ML. These findings propose a conceptual and practical separation between ML and AI to enable targeted research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and solutions to challenges like explainability, transparency, and sustainability. The paper underscores the importance of recognizing ML’s independence in advancing both fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3553032
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking Away From AI: The Ontological and Ethical Evolution of Machine Learning

Enrico Barbierato, Alice Gatti, Daniele Toti, Andrea Pozzi et al.
15 citations
IEEE Access
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
35.49
article

Breaking Away From AI: The Ontological and Ethical Evolution of Machine Learning

Enrico Barbierato, Alice Gatti, Daniele Toti, Andrea Pozzi, Alessandro Incremona
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) has historically been associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) but has developed into an independent discipline. This paper argues for the ontological independence of ML, driven by its unique methodologies, applications, and ethical considerations. A bibliometric analysis reveals that ML research output (494,572 publications from 2017–2023) surpasses AI (283,762 publications) by 74%, reflecting its rapid growth and specialization. Unlike AI’s pursuit of general intelligence and symbolic reasoning, ML focuses on data-driven performance optimization, with impactful applications in computer vision, natural language processing (NLP), and autonomous systems. The study highlights ethical challenges—such as addressing algorithmic bias (50 occurrences), fairness (2,778 publications), and environmental sustainability (283 related works)—which emphasize the need for dedicated ethical frameworks tailored to ML. These findings propose a conceptual and practical separation between ML and AI to enable targeted research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and solutions to challenges like explainability, transparency, and sustainability. The paper underscores the importance of recognizing ML’s independence in advancing both fields.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
35.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Breaking Away From AI: The Ontological and Ethical Evolution of Machine Learning — Enrico Barbierato, Alice Gatti, et al. · IEEE Access (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS