Effects Of Nicardipine And Remifentanil Combination On Surgical Visual Field And Hemodynamic Parameters In Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Cases

ABSTRACT Objective: This study examined the impact of using a Nicardipine/Remifentanil combination for controlled hypotension (CH) in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) cases. The goal was to minimize bleeding and enhance the visibility of the endoscopic field. The study focused on surgical field visibility, hemodynamic data, and the impact on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain. Materials and Methods: Our study included 73 patients between the ages of 18 and 65. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group R (Remifentanil) consisted of 36 patients, and Group RN (Remifentanil/Nicardipine combination) consisted of 37 patients. Following intubation, In Group R, patients were administered an intravenous (IV) infusion of Remifentanil at a rate of 0.05–2.0 µg/kg/min, while Group RN received Remifentanil at 0.025–1 µg/kg/min , Nicardipine at 0.5–3.5 µg/kg/min. The target mean arterial pressure (MAP) for both groups was set at 50–65 mmHg. After the surgical procedure began, bleeding volume, suction requirements, and surgical field visibility were assessed at 15-minute intervals with the Boezaart scale. Duration of stay in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), incidence of nausea vomiting; pain assessment with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were evaluated.. Results: PACU length of stay was considerably shorter in Group RN compared to Group R (p=0.003). Pain scoring was greater in Group R (p=0.001). Nausea vomiting scores were less in group RN (p=0.037). SAP and MAP were considerably lower in group RN (p=0.018 and p=0.023). HR values during all time periods were greater in group RN (p= ˂0.001). Boezaart score was lower in group RN during all time periods (p= ˂0.001). Conclusion: The Remifentanil/Nicardipine combination provides better surgical field quality for controlled hypotension (CH) in FESS. This combination is preferable over Remifentanil alone, as it not only maintains CH effectively but also shows greater success in reducing postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting scores.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medical Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2024.11.250
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects Of Nicardipine And Remifentanil Combination On Surgical Visual Field And Hemodynamic Parameters In Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Cases

Erol Karaaslan, ahmet zkan, Oya zde, yeliz zer et al.
Annals of Medical Research
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Effects Of Nicardipine And Remifentanil Combination On Surgical Visual Field And Hemodynamic Parameters In Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Cases

Erol Karaaslan, ahmet zkan, Oya zde, yeliz zer, nur lha
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study examined the impact of using a Nicardipine/Remifentanil combination for controlled hypotension (CH) in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) cases. The goal was to minimize bleeding and enhance the visibility of the endoscopic field. The study focused on surgical field visibility, hemodynamic data, and the impact on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain. Materials and Methods: Our study included 73 patients between the ages of 18 and 65. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group R (Remifentanil) consisted of 36 patients, and Group RN (Remifentanil/Nicardipine combination) consisted of 37 patients. Following intubation, In Group R, patients were administered an intravenous (IV) infusion of Remifentanil at a rate of 0.05–2.0 µg/kg/min, while Group RN received Remifentanil at 0.025–1 µg/kg/min , Nicardipine at 0.5–3.5 µg/kg/min. The target mean arterial pressure (MAP) for both groups was set at 50–65 mmHg. After the surgical procedure began, bleeding volume, suction requirements, and surgical field visibility were assessed at 15-minute intervals with the Boezaart scale. Duration of stay in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), incidence of nausea vomiting; pain assessment with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were evaluated.. Results: PACU length of stay was considerably shorter in Group RN compared to Group R (p=0.003). Pain scoring was greater in Group R (p=0.001). Nausea vomiting scores were less in group RN (p=0.037). SAP and MAP were considerably lower in group RN (p=0.018 and p=0.023). HR values during all time periods were greater in group RN (p= ˂0.001). Boezaart score was lower in group RN during all time periods (p= ˂0.001). Conclusion: The Remifentanil/Nicardipine combination provides better surgical field quality for controlled hypotension (CH) in FESS. This combination is preferable over Remifentanil alone, as it not only maintains CH effectively but also shows greater success in reducing postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting scores.

Annals of Medical ResearchVol. 32(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.