The relationship between language attitudes and metaphonological awareness with the pronunciation of adolescent learners of Polish as an L3

A number of factors such as age of onset of learning, motivation and type of instruction have been shown to influence the phonological development of foreign language learners[1] (cf. e. g., Nagle 2022). More recently, some studies have suggested that language attitudes and metaphonological awareness might also play a role in the development of foreign language pronunciation by classroom learners (cf. e. g., Sardegna/Lee/Kusey 2018; Saito 2019). However, no investigations have yet been carried out that directly relate these two factors to the learners’ pronunciation of specific sounds of the target language. This study investigates the relationship between both the learners’ attitudes and metaphonological awareness with the development of their pronunciation skills during the first year of learning a new foreign language. We investigated 21 adolescents (aged 12–13) with L1 German and L2 English, who had just begun to learn Polish as their L3. Three types of data were collected at the very beginning and the end of the school year: a) questionnaire data on the learners’ attitudes towards learning Polish, learning languages and their pronunciation; b) a score of the learners’ metaphonological awareness measured with a Polish accent-mimicry task, and c) auditory analyses of their pronunciation of Polish /r/ and vowel reduction in a delayed repetition task. The results of mixed effects logistic regression modelling show that some of the learners’ attitudes predict their accuracy of pronouncing Polish /r/ and unreduced vowels. Moreover, the learners’ pronunciation of unreduced vowels, but not /r/ in Polish improved significantly over the school year and higher metaphonological awareness predicted higher accuracy of unreduced vowels in Polish. The results are discussed from both a theoretical and pedagogical perspective. [1] We use the term “foreign language learners” to refer to individuals living in the L1 environment and studying a non-native language in the classroom setting, either as their first foreign language (L2) or second foreign language (L3). Research on individual learner differences in non-native phonological learning has commonly used the term “second language” (L2) as an umbrella term for all types of acquisitional contexts, including those which concern individuals studying an additional language in the target language environment (cf. Nagle 2022; Hammarberg 2010). [1] We use the term “foreign language learners” to refer to individuals living in the L1 environment and studying a non-native language in the classroom setting, either as their first foreign language (L2) or second foreign language (L3). Research on individual learner differences in non-native phonological learning has commonly used the term “second language” (L2) as an umbrella term for all types of acquisitional contexts, including those which concern individuals studying an additional language in the target language environment (cf. Nagle 2022; Hammarberg 2010).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistik Online
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.134.12179
Primary Topic
Language and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between language attitudes and metaphonological awareness with the pronunciation of adolescent learners of Polish as an L3

Romana Kopečková, Ulrike Gut, Zeyu Li
Linguistik Online
Language and Culture
article

The relationship between language attitudes and metaphonological awareness with the pronunciation of adolescent learners of Polish as an L3

Romana Kopečková, Ulrike Gut, Zeyu Li
article en

Abstract

A number of factors such as age of onset of learning, motivation and type of instruction have been shown to influence the phonological development of foreign language learners[1] (cf. e. g., Nagle 2022). More recently, some studies have suggested that language attitudes and metaphonological awareness might also play a role in the development of foreign language pronunciation by classroom learners (cf. e. g., Sardegna/Lee/Kusey 2018; Saito 2019). However, no investigations have yet been carried out that directly relate these two factors to the learners’ pronunciation of specific sounds of the target language. This study investigates the relationship between both the learners’ attitudes and metaphonological awareness with the development of their pronunciation skills during the first year of learning a new foreign language. We investigated 21 adolescents (aged 12–13) with L1 German and L2 English, who had just begun to learn Polish as their L3. Three types of data were collected at the very beginning and the end of the school year: a) questionnaire data on the learners’ attitudes towards learning Polish, learning languages and their pronunciation; b) a score of the learners’ metaphonological awareness measured with a Polish accent-mimicry task, and c) auditory analyses of their pronunciation of Polish /r/ and vowel reduction in a delayed repetition task. The results of mixed effects logistic regression modelling show that some of the learners’ attitudes predict their accuracy of pronouncing Polish /r/ and unreduced vowels. Moreover, the learners’ pronunciation of unreduced vowels, but not /r/ in Polish improved significantly over the school year and higher metaphonological awareness predicted higher accuracy of unreduced vowels in Polish. The results are discussed from both a theoretical and pedagogical perspective. [1] We use the term “foreign language learners” to refer to individuals living in the L1 environment and studying a non-native language in the classroom setting, either as their first foreign language (L2) or second foreign language (L3). Research on individual learner differences in non-native phonological learning has commonly used the term “second language” (L2) as an umbrella term for all types of acquisitional contexts, including those which concern individuals studying an additional language in the target language environment (cf. Nagle 2022; Hammarberg 2010). [1] We use the term “foreign language learners” to refer to individuals living in the L1 environment and studying a non-native language in the classroom setting, either as their first foreign language (L2) or second foreign language (L3). Research on individual learner differences in non-native phonological learning has commonly used the term “second language” (L2) as an umbrella term for all types of acquisitional contexts, including those which concern individuals studying an additional language in the target language environment (cf. Nagle 2022; Hammarberg 2010).

Linguistik OnlineVol. 134(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Language and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.