Intermodal mobility: A psychometric and behavioural analysis of public transport users in Porto Metropolitan Area

• We conduct psychometric and behavioural segmentations of intermodal PT users. • Choice riders are much more likely to use rail (i.e., metro and train) • Captive riders are significantly more reliant on the bus. • Rail is perceived as a competitive alternative, including against the private car. • The bus is perceived as subpar, mostly used due to a lack of alternatives. As a consequence of the several negative externalities associated with car usage, there is a growing pressure to promote more sustainable mobility habits through supporting transport alternatives. An increasingly attractive solution is the concept of intermodal mobility, i.e., the combination of different modes of transport in a single trip, leveraging the strengths of each mode to provide a more sustainable and efficient transport option. Despite its potential, research on intermodal mobility remains limited, with studies focusing on the travel behaviour of intermodal users being especially rare. However, to gain a comprehensive understanding of intermodality and its potential role in promoting sustainable mobility, it is crucial to explore the intermodal travel behaviour from the user’s point of view, including their patterns and motivations. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to analyse the travel behaviour of intermodal users, focusing particularly on those that combine public transport (PT). Using a representative mobility survey conducted by the Portuguese National Statistics Institute to the Porto Metropolitan Area (with 40 393 respondents, 1868 of whom intermodal PT users), we have identified and characterized distinct profiles of intermodal PT users through marketing segmentation. The market segmentation analyses have revealed two profiles of intermodal PT users based on their motivations and perceptions of using PT (i.e., psychometric segmentation) and four profiles based on their main modes of intermodal travel (i.e., behavioural segmentation). Notably, a connection between the psychometric and behavioural segments has been found: choice riders are significantly more likely to use rail options such as metro and train, while captive riders are much more dependent on buses. These findings hold significant policy implications for the promotion of intermodal PT systems, including by highlighting the competitiveness of rail against the private car and the reliance of the most socially disadvantaged groups on the bus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Travel Behaviour and Society
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101027
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intermodal mobility: A psychometric and behavioural analysis of public transport users in Porto Metropolitan Area

João Filipe Teixeira, António Couto, Hudyeron Rocha
4 citations
Travel Behaviour and Society
Urban Transport and Accessibility
8.71
article

Intermodal mobility: A psychometric and behavioural analysis of public transport users in Porto Metropolitan Area

João Filipe Teixeira, António Couto, Hudyeron Rocha
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• We conduct psychometric and behavioural segmentations of intermodal PT users. • Choice riders are much more likely to use rail (i.e., metro and train) • Captive riders are significantly more reliant on the bus. • Rail is perceived as a competitive alternative, including against the private car. • The bus is perceived as subpar, mostly used due to a lack of alternatives. As a consequence of the several negative externalities associated with car usage, there is a growing pressure to promote more sustainable mobility habits through supporting transport alternatives. An increasingly attractive solution is the concept of intermodal mobility, i.e., the combination of different modes of transport in a single trip, leveraging the strengths of each mode to provide a more sustainable and efficient transport option. Despite its potential, research on intermodal mobility remains limited, with studies focusing on the travel behaviour of intermodal users being especially rare. However, to gain a comprehensive understanding of intermodality and its potential role in promoting sustainable mobility, it is crucial to explore the intermodal travel behaviour from the user’s point of view, including their patterns and motivations. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to analyse the travel behaviour of intermodal users, focusing particularly on those that combine public transport (PT). Using a representative mobility survey conducted by the Portuguese National Statistics Institute to the Porto Metropolitan Area (with 40 393 respondents, 1868 of whom intermodal PT users), we have identified and characterized distinct profiles of intermodal PT users through marketing segmentation. The market segmentation analyses have revealed two profiles of intermodal PT users based on their motivations and perceptions of using PT (i.e., psychometric segmentation) and four profiles based on their main modes of intermodal travel (i.e., behavioural segmentation). Notably, a connection between the psychometric and behavioural segments has been found: choice riders are significantly more likely to use rail options such as metro and train, while captive riders are much more dependent on buses. These findings hold significant policy implications for the promotion of intermodal PT systems, including by highlighting the competitiveness of rail against the private car and the reliance of the most socially disadvantaged groups on the bus.

Travel Behaviour and SocietyVol. 40
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
8.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.