Working on Unprovenienced Coptic Manuscripts

In the last few years, some researchers have expressed concerns about the publication of antiquities whose previous owners cannot be determined-they stress the importance of both the archaeological findspot ("provenience") and the chain of ownership ("provenance").The present article focuses on a specific category of antiquities, i.e., Coptic manuscripts, and it addresses the possible implications of the 2022 "IACS Resolution on the Ethical Handling of Cultural Heritage".Firstly, after defining a few terms and outlining the debate, the article presents the differences between two types of Coptic manuscripts, i.e., literary and documentary.Secondly, it addresses the criteria that allow provenience to be traced back even if the exact findspot is unknown.Thirdly, the article lists the details one can retrieve even without knowing provenience.The article ends with suggestions on how to pursue the debate on the handling of unprovenienced objects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Egyptian Archaeology and Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31526/seas.2025.522
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working on Unprovenienced Coptic Manuscripts

Julien Delhez
Studies in Egyptian Archaeology and Science
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

Working on Unprovenienced Coptic Manuscripts

Julien Delhez
article en

Abstract

In the last few years, some researchers have expressed concerns about the publication of antiquities whose previous owners cannot be determined-they stress the importance of both the archaeological findspot ("provenience") and the chain of ownership ("provenance").The present article focuses on a specific category of antiquities, i.e., Coptic manuscripts, and it addresses the possible implications of the 2022 "IACS Resolution on the Ethical Handling of Cultural Heritage".Firstly, after defining a few terms and outlining the debate, the article presents the differences between two types of Coptic manuscripts, i.e., literary and documentary.Secondly, it addresses the criteria that allow provenience to be traced back even if the exact findspot is unknown.Thirdly, the article lists the details one can retrieve even without knowing provenience.The article ends with suggestions on how to pursue the debate on the handling of unprovenienced objects.

Studies in Egyptian Archaeology and Science
KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.