Shifting attitudes and trust in AI: Influences on organizational AI adoption

This paper investigates how trust in artificial intelligence (AI) influences its adoption in organizational settings, emphasizing the dynamic nature of attitudes towards AI. Using qualitative data from 29 interviews with AI developers, managers, and users, the study identifies three attitudinal positions: positive, negative, and instrumental. The findings reveal that attitudes towards AI are changing, often shifting from negative or instrumental to positive as individuals gain knowledge and experience with AI technologies. For example, we found evidence that instrumental attitudes, which require evidence before trust is established, become more positive when people become more familiar with AI. Negative attitudes, rooted in perceived threats like job displacement or privacy concerns, tend to shift when people begun to realize AI benefits. Building on organizational trust and trust in AI theory, this paper extends the understanding of differences in how AI developers, managers and users develop trust in AI. • Attitudes towards AI shift in a positive direction as experience with AI increases. • Trust in AI varies across roles: developers, managers, and users approach trust differently. • Over time, people with positive attitudes toward AI develop a calibrated trust, grounded in a realistic view of AI's limitations. • Organizational support and visible benefits are key to fostering trust and AI adoption. • Trust in AI is crucial for adoption, especially in high-risk sectors like healthcare and finance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124108
Citations
34
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
84.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting attitudes and trust in AI: Influences on organizational AI adoption

Sarah J. Daly, Greg Hearn, Anna Wiewiora
34 citations
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
AI in Service Interactions
84.35
article

Shifting attitudes and trust in AI: Influences on organizational AI adoption

Sarah J. Daly, Greg Hearn, Anna Wiewiora
article en
34 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates how trust in artificial intelligence (AI) influences its adoption in organizational settings, emphasizing the dynamic nature of attitudes towards AI. Using qualitative data from 29 interviews with AI developers, managers, and users, the study identifies three attitudinal positions: positive, negative, and instrumental. The findings reveal that attitudes towards AI are changing, often shifting from negative or instrumental to positive as individuals gain knowledge and experience with AI technologies. For example, we found evidence that instrumental attitudes, which require evidence before trust is established, become more positive when people become more familiar with AI. Negative attitudes, rooted in perceived threats like job displacement or privacy concerns, tend to shift when people begun to realize AI benefits. Building on organizational trust and trust in AI theory, this paper extends the understanding of differences in how AI developers, managers and users develop trust in AI. • Attitudes towards AI shift in a positive direction as experience with AI increases. • Trust in AI varies across roles: developers, managers, and users approach trust differently. • Over time, people with positive attitudes toward AI develop a calibrated trust, grounded in a realistic view of AI's limitations. • Organizational support and visible benefits are key to fostering trust and AI adoption. • Trust in AI is crucial for adoption, especially in high-risk sectors like healthcare and finance.

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 215
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
AI in Service Interactions
84.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.