Who should respond to substance-exposed infants? Reflections on U.S. policies limiting the role of child protective services

The number of U.S. adults with substance use disorders has increased rapidly over the past decade, raising concerns about the safety and wellbeing of young children with affected caregivers. There are ongoing debates about which government entities --child welfare agencies, health departments, law enforcement - should be responsible for responding to this problem and how they should respond. Regardless of the responsible entity suggested, myriad challenges inhibit effective responses to this crisis. This article discusses how federal and state agencies are currently responding to children in families affected by substance use, with a particular emphasis on substance-exposed infants. We reflect on three core issues that present a challenge to effective and compassionate care for both infants and their caregivers, including gaps in infrastructure, lack of effective treatment engagement and facilitation strategies, and decentralized and siloed data to evaluate the effects of policy and programmatic changes. We provide recommendations for improving upon the status quo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Protection and Practice
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100137
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who should respond to substance-exposed infants? Reflections on U.S. policies limiting the role of child protective services

Melissa Jonson‐Reid, Sarah A. Font, Junlachak Peter Siriprakorn
1 citations
Child Protection and Practice
Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
3.49
article

Who should respond to substance-exposed infants? Reflections on U.S. policies limiting the role of child protective services

Melissa Jonson‐Reid, Sarah A. Font, Junlachak Peter Siriprakorn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The number of U.S. adults with substance use disorders has increased rapidly over the past decade, raising concerns about the safety and wellbeing of young children with affected caregivers. There are ongoing debates about which government entities --child welfare agencies, health departments, law enforcement - should be responsible for responding to this problem and how they should respond. Regardless of the responsible entity suggested, myriad challenges inhibit effective responses to this crisis. This article discusses how federal and state agencies are currently responding to children in families affected by substance use, with a particular emphasis on substance-exposed infants. We reflect on three core issues that present a challenge to effective and compassionate care for both infants and their caregivers, including gaps in infrastructure, lack of effective treatment engagement and facilitation strategies, and decentralized and siloed data to evaluate the effects of policy and programmatic changes. We provide recommendations for improving upon the status quo.

Child Protection and PracticeVol. 5
Pennsylvania State University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who should respond to substance-exposed infants? Reflections on U.S. policies limiting the role of child protective services — Melissa Jonson‐Reid, Sarah A. Font, et al. · Child Protection and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS