Hydrological Whiplash: Highlighting the Need for Better Understanding and Quantification of Sub‐Seasonal Hydrological Extreme Transitions

ABSTRACT In this commentary, we aim to (1) describe ways that hydrological intensification and hydrological whiplash (sub‐seasonal transitions between hydrological extremes) may impact water management decision‐making, (2) introduce the complexities of identifying and quantifying hydrological extreme transitions, (3) discuss the processes controlling hydrological transitions and trends in hydrological extremes through time, (4) discuss considerations involved in modeling hydrological extreme transitions, and (5) motivate additional research by suggesting priority research questions that diverge from an assumption of independence between extreme events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70113
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrological Whiplash: Highlighting the Need for Better Understanding and Quantification of Sub‐Seasonal Hydrological Extreme Transitions

Manuela I. Brunner, Eduardo Muñoz‐Castro, Caelan E. Simeone, S. A. Archfield et al.
8 citations
Hydrological Processes
Climate variability and models
8.84
article

Hydrological Whiplash: Highlighting the Need for Better Understanding and Quantification of Sub‐Seasonal Hydrological Extreme Transitions

Manuela I. Brunner, Eduardo Muñoz‐Castro, Caelan E. Simeone, S. A. Archfield, John C. Hammond, Eugene Magee, Bailey Anderson, Rachael Armitage
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this commentary, we aim to (1) describe ways that hydrological intensification and hydrological whiplash (sub‐seasonal transitions between hydrological extremes) may impact water management decision‐making, (2) introduce the complexities of identifying and quantifying hydrological extreme transitions, (3) discuss the processes controlling hydrological transitions and trends in hydrological extremes through time, (4) discuss considerations involved in modeling hydrological extreme transitions, and (5) motivate additional research by suggesting priority research questions that diverge from an assumption of independence between extreme events.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(3)
United States Geological Survey (US), District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (US), ETH Zurich (CH), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (CH), Maryland-Delaware-D.C. Water Science Center, Oregon Water Science Center
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, U.S. Geological Survey, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate variability and models
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.