TSANZ Abstract

Background:<br/>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) should incorporate education that is tailored to patient preferences and learning style to ensure engagement. However, there is significant variation in the content and delivery of education within pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes.<br/><br/>Methods:<br/>An online survey elicited the views of respiratory patients about PR education (three sections; demographic information; PR knowledge, stage of completion of PR and the educational component of PR). For subgroup analysis two variables were explored, mMRC score and PR stage (pre-PR, undertaking PR, completed PR) on the reporting of the importance of educational topics.<br/><br/>Results:<br/>Survey responses (N=93) were analysed; respondents were aged 70±13.6 years, predominately female (55%, 51/93), ex-smokers (67%, 62/93) and retired (79.6%, 74/92). Most (43.0%) had a mMRC of 2 (34.4% 0-1, 43.0% - 2, 22.6% &gt;2). Most had completed PR (76.3% 71/93), the remainder were pre-PR or had just started (22.6%, 21/93). Sub-group analysis explored the impact of mMRC score and PR stage. Understanding the need for CT scans and breathing tests was significantly more important to PR completers (98.5%, 64/65) compared to Pre-PR participants (81.3%,13/16, p&lt;0.05). Learning how to make small changes in day-to-day living, the value of strengthening exercises or the importance of DNARs were not highly rated by those who were pre-PR compared to PR completers (all p&lt;0.05). Patients with significant breathlessness affecting quality of life (mMRC 2) rated expert patient strategies, breath control, power of attorney, planning ahead and behaviour change strategies significantly more important (all p&lt;0.05) to them compared to participants with lower mMRC (mMRC 0-1) and more symptoms burden (mMRC 3-4).<br/><br/>Conclusions:<br/>PR sessions often contain a mix of participants at different stages of their rehabilitation journey which may influence learning preferences. Sessions should be structured to maximise the experience for all participants.

Publication Details

Journal
Internal Medicine Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TSANZ Abstract

1 citations
Internal Medicine Journal
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
1.52
article

TSANZ Abstract

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background:<br/>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) should incorporate education that is tailored to patient preferences and learning style to ensure engagement. However, there is significant variation in the content and delivery of education within pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes.<br/><br/>Methods:<br/>An online survey elicited the views of respiratory patients about PR education (three sections; demographic information; PR knowledge, stage of completion of PR and the educational component of PR). For subgroup analysis two variables were explored, mMRC score and PR stage (pre-PR, undertaking PR, completed PR) on the reporting of the importance of educational topics.<br/><br/>Results:<br/>Survey responses (N=93) were analysed; respondents were aged 70±13.6 years, predominately female (55%, 51/93), ex-smokers (67%, 62/93) and retired (79.6%, 74/92). Most (43.0%) had a mMRC of 2 (34.4% 0-1, 43.0% - 2, 22.6% &gt;2). Most had completed PR (76.3% 71/93), the remainder were pre-PR or had just started (22.6%, 21/93). Sub-group analysis explored the impact of mMRC score and PR stage. Understanding the need for CT scans and breathing tests was significantly more important to PR completers (98.5%, 64/65) compared to Pre-PR participants (81.3%,13/16, p&lt;0.05). Learning how to make small changes in day-to-day living, the value of strengthening exercises or the importance of DNARs were not highly rated by those who were pre-PR compared to PR completers (all p&lt;0.05). Patients with significant breathlessness affecting quality of life (mMRC 2) rated expert patient strategies, breath control, power of attorney, planning ahead and behaviour change strategies significantly more important (all p&lt;0.05) to them compared to participants with lower mMRC (mMRC 0-1) and more symptoms burden (mMRC 3-4).<br/><br/>Conclusions:<br/>PR sessions often contain a mix of participants at different stages of their rehabilitation journey which may influence learning preferences. Sessions should be structured to maximise the experience for all participants.

Internal Medicine JournalVol. 55(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.