Reactance, rationalization, and women's rights for safe abortion: Evidence from Roe vs. Wade's overturn

This study explores the societal response to the overturning of Roe vs. Wade and its potential impact on abortion rights. We use data from Google Trends and Twitter engagement to comprehensively analyze public responses. Analysis of Google search trends and Twitter activity reveals a significant surge in public interest and concerns immediately following the news of the overturn. The findings demonstrate a clear polarization of sentiments, with expressions of both pro-choice and pro-life perspectives. Additionally, a heterogeneity analysis indicates that reactions vary among states, with states hostile to abortion rights exhibiting heightened negative sentiment. Overall, our findings highlight an intense but short-lived public reaction to the ongoing debate surrounding abortion rights, which may have broader social implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106956
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reactance, rationalization, and women's rights for safe abortion: Evidence from Roe vs. Wade's overturn

Louis‐Philippe Beland, Ghina Abdul Baki, Myra Yazbeck, Aline Zayat
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Reactance, rationalization, and women's rights for safe abortion: Evidence from Roe vs. Wade's overturn

Louis‐Philippe Beland, Ghina Abdul Baki, Myra Yazbeck, Aline Zayat
article en

Abstract

This study explores the societal response to the overturning of Roe vs. Wade and its potential impact on abortion rights. We use data from Google Trends and Twitter engagement to comprehensively analyze public responses. Analysis of Google search trends and Twitter activity reveals a significant surge in public interest and concerns immediately following the news of the overturn. The findings demonstrate a clear polarization of sentiments, with expressions of both pro-choice and pro-life perspectives. Additionally, a heterogeneity analysis indicates that reactions vary among states, with states hostile to abortion rights exhibiting heightened negative sentiment. Overall, our findings highlight an intense but short-lived public reaction to the ongoing debate surrounding abortion rights, which may have broader social implications.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 233
University of Ottawa (CA), The University of Queensland (AU), Carleton University (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reactance, rationalization, and women's rights for safe abortion: Evidence from Roe vs. Wade's overturn — Louis‐Philippe Beland, Ghina Abdul Baki, et al. · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS