A comprehensive survey of imaging-based methods of measuring intracranial pressure

Intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement is vital in managing and treating patients with brain injuries, brain tumors, and other neuro-ophthalmic conditions. Invasive methods have reached a high standard of accuracy but pose multiple risks to patients and require specialized resources. In contrast, non-invasive methods indirectly estimate ICP based on related physiological properties. This paper surveys imaging-based methods that utilize cerebro-ophthalmic anatomy and fluid dynamics. The theoretical basis of each method is presented, including the physiological attributes and imaging modality used. Details of empirical studies are also presented, including subjects (type, population, medical indication, captured anatomies), methodology, and evaluations of ICP estimation accuracy. The pros and cons of each method are presented in terms of complexity, patient acceptability, operating expertise, potential for clinical application, costs, and time. Whilst none of the methods in the survey has to date achieved the reliability and accuracy of invasive methods used clinically, those based on transcranial and orbital ultrasonography and direct retinal imaging demonstrate great promise. Refinements to these methods, including the application of modern deep learning techniques, offer the prospect of non-invasive, clinically acceptable, accurate and automatic measurement of ICP.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107854
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive survey of imaging-based methods of measuring intracranial pressure

AZM Ehtesham Chowdhury, Ferdous Sohel, William H. Morgan, Graham J. Mann et al.
2 citations
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
2.78
article

A comprehensive survey of imaging-based methods of measuring intracranial pressure

AZM Ehtesham Chowdhury, Ferdous Sohel, William H. Morgan, Graham J. Mann, Andrew Mehnert
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement is vital in managing and treating patients with brain injuries, brain tumors, and other neuro-ophthalmic conditions. Invasive methods have reached a high standard of accuracy but pose multiple risks to patients and require specialized resources. In contrast, non-invasive methods indirectly estimate ICP based on related physiological properties. This paper surveys imaging-based methods that utilize cerebro-ophthalmic anatomy and fluid dynamics. The theoretical basis of each method is presented, including the physiological attributes and imaging modality used. Details of empirical studies are also presented, including subjects (type, population, medical indication, captured anatomies), methodology, and evaluations of ICP estimation accuracy. The pros and cons of each method are presented in terms of complexity, patient acceptability, operating expertise, potential for clinical application, costs, and time. Whilst none of the methods in the survey has to date achieved the reliability and accuracy of invasive methods used clinically, those based on transcranial and orbital ultrasonography and direct retinal imaging demonstrate great promise. Refinements to these methods, including the application of modern deep learning techniques, offer the prospect of non-invasive, clinically acceptable, accurate and automatic measurement of ICP.

Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlVol. 107
Lions Eye Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.