Gedragsdeskundigen en juristen in het strafrecht

Behavioral experts and law practitioners in criminal law: Do we understand one another? Legal insanity, criminal responsibility and dangerousness are concepts that connect fundamental law concepts about human nature, guilt, blame and punishment to psychomedical knowledge about mental disorders that may deprive rational understanding or acting. These issues has raised serious debates among medical, psychology and law professionals for over decades, and across the world. In the Netherlands, the criterion and/or conditions under which mental illness may lead to legal insanity was unspecified, until the Dutch Supreme Court recently formulated some specifications in the case of ‘Thijs H.’. There is however still much room to debate; among the behavioral discipline and the criminal law practitioners, but also interdisciplinary. This contribution describes the main areas debated in a large multidisciplinary meeting of 200 psychiatrists, psychologists, judges, prosecutors and lawyers, in September 2024 in Rotterdam.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Forensische Psychiatrie en Psychologie
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/tfpp/295044302024002003006
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gedragsdeskundigen en juristen in het strafrecht

Louise Smallenburg, Maaike Kempes, Sabine J. Roza, Sadaf Rakhshandehroo
Tijdschrift voor Forensische Psychiatrie en Psychologie
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Gedragsdeskundigen en juristen in het strafrecht

Louise Smallenburg, Maaike Kempes, Sabine J. Roza, Sadaf Rakhshandehroo
article en

Abstract

Behavioral experts and law practitioners in criminal law: Do we understand one another? Legal insanity, criminal responsibility and dangerousness are concepts that connect fundamental law concepts about human nature, guilt, blame and punishment to psychomedical knowledge about mental disorders that may deprive rational understanding or acting. These issues has raised serious debates among medical, psychology and law professionals for over decades, and across the world. In the Netherlands, the criterion and/or conditions under which mental illness may lead to legal insanity was unspecified, until the Dutch Supreme Court recently formulated some specifications in the case of ‘Thijs H.’. There is however still much room to debate; among the behavioral discipline and the criminal law practitioners, but also interdisciplinary. This contribution describes the main areas debated in a large multidisciplinary meeting of 200 psychiatrists, psychologists, judges, prosecutors and lawyers, in September 2024 in Rotterdam.

Tijdschrift voor Forensische Psychiatrie en PsychologieVol. 2(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.