Computed Tomography Scan Missed Diagnosis of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Abstract The present study reports a unique case diagnosed clinically as an intra-abdominal mass query Gastrointestinal stromal tumour but autopsy findings were that of a perforated duodenal ulcer with chemical peritonitis. X-ray and computed tomography scan were reviewed separately by two different sets of radiological experts and were unrevealing of the classical air under the diaphragm. An assessment of intra-abdominal malignancy was made and the patient died while being worked up for biopsy. At autopsy, a benign perforated ulcer was seen which was also confirmed on histology. The patient died from septicaemia. This case report is unique in describing a great radiological diagnostic challenge and provides a learning point for clinicians. It is reported to lay emphasis on the need for an increase in doctor’s awareness of the potential of radiological misdiagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer and to encourage a high index of suspicion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nigerian Journal of Medicine
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/njm.njm_25_24
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computed Tomography Scan Missed Diagnosis of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Oluwatunbi Joy Oluwaseun
Nigerian Journal of Medicine
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Computed Tomography Scan Missed Diagnosis of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Oluwatunbi Joy Oluwaseun
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present study reports a unique case diagnosed clinically as an intra-abdominal mass query Gastrointestinal stromal tumour but autopsy findings were that of a perforated duodenal ulcer with chemical peritonitis. X-ray and computed tomography scan were reviewed separately by two different sets of radiological experts and were unrevealing of the classical air under the diaphragm. An assessment of intra-abdominal malignancy was made and the patient died while being worked up for biopsy. At autopsy, a benign perforated ulcer was seen which was also confirmed on histology. The patient died from septicaemia. This case report is unique in describing a great radiological diagnostic challenge and provides a learning point for clinicians. It is reported to lay emphasis on the need for an increase in doctor’s awareness of the potential of radiological misdiagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer and to encourage a high index of suspicion.

Nigerian Journal of MedicineVol. 33(4)
Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.