PRISMA Guidelines: Methodological Adaptation for Systematic Reviews in Education

Introduction: Systematic reviews in education require methodological adaptations due to the complexity of educational data and contexts, making it necessary to adjust the PRISMA guidelines, initially designed for health, to meet the needs of the educational field. Objective: To adapt the PRISMA guidelines for their methodological implementation in systematic reviews within the educational domain. Methodos: A documentary and comparative analysis between PRISMA and educational studies was conducted, complemented by consultations with specialists, allowing the development of an adapted framework based on rigorous criteria and methodological tools tailored to education. Results: An adapted framework was proposed, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, methodological procedures, and tools for quality assessment, positively impacting the relevance, applicability, and rigor of educational systematic reviews. Conclusions: The adaptation of PRISMA to the educational field will enhance the quality of systematic reviews, strengthening their impact on policies, pedagogical strategies, and evidence-based teaching practices in complex contexts such as Latin America.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data & Metadata
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025698
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRISMA Guidelines: Methodological Adaptation for Systematic Reviews in Education

Raquel Suárez Sánchez, Rosangela Caicedo–Quiroz, Laura Cristina Barba Miranda, Richar Jacobo Posso Pacheco et al.
2 citations
Data & Metadata
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
4.21
article

PRISMA Guidelines: Methodological Adaptation for Systematic Reviews in Education

Raquel Suárez Sánchez, Rosangela Caicedo–Quiroz, Laura Cristina Barba Miranda, Richar Jacobo Posso Pacheco, Giceya de la Caridad Maqueira Caraballo, Julio Barzola–Monteses
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Systematic reviews in education require methodological adaptations due to the complexity of educational data and contexts, making it necessary to adjust the PRISMA guidelines, initially designed for health, to meet the needs of the educational field. Objective: To adapt the PRISMA guidelines for their methodological implementation in systematic reviews within the educational domain. Methodos: A documentary and comparative analysis between PRISMA and educational studies was conducted, complemented by consultations with specialists, allowing the development of an adapted framework based on rigorous criteria and methodological tools tailored to education. Results: An adapted framework was proposed, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, methodological procedures, and tools for quality assessment, positively impacting the relevance, applicability, and rigor of educational systematic reviews. Conclusions: The adaptation of PRISMA to the educational field will enhance the quality of systematic reviews, strengthening their impact on policies, pedagogical strategies, and evidence-based teaching practices in complex contexts such as Latin America.

Data & MetadataVol. 4
University of Guayaquil (EC), Universidad Tecnica de Machala (EC), Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.