Does Board Gender Diversity Make Firms Less Greenwashed?

ABSTRACT This study contributes to the literature on corporate environmental responsibility by investigating the impact of female board directorship on the environmental performance of listed financial and non‐financial firms in Europe from 2013 to 2022. We propose a novel proxy for greenwashing that has not yet been implemented at the firm level in financial studies. We applied panel regression estimation with fixed effects to 1300 firm‐year observations. The misleading baseline results show a negative relationship between female board directorship and environmental performance. Conversely, the second layer of analysis indicates a negative relationship between our greenwashing measure and female board directorship, supporting the positive role of women on boards of directors; spurious environmental performance measures obscure this significant association. A set of robustness checks and alternative specifications (generalized least squares and two‐stage least squares) confirmed the consistency of our empirical results. This study has theoretical and managerial implications by reinforcing the crucial role of women in top management positions as supporters of environmental initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12799
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Board Gender Diversity Make Firms Less Greenwashed?

Egidio Palmieri, Matteo Cotugno, Greta Benedetta Ferilli
5 citations
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Gender Diversity and Inequality
19.34
article

Does Board Gender Diversity Make Firms Less Greenwashed?

Egidio Palmieri, Matteo Cotugno, Greta Benedetta Ferilli
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study contributes to the literature on corporate environmental responsibility by investigating the impact of female board directorship on the environmental performance of listed financial and non‐financial firms in Europe from 2013 to 2022. We propose a novel proxy for greenwashing that has not yet been implemented at the firm level in financial studies. We applied panel regression estimation with fixed effects to 1300 firm‐year observations. The misleading baseline results show a negative relationship between female board directorship and environmental performance. Conversely, the second layer of analysis indicates a negative relationship between our greenwashing measure and female board directorship, supporting the positive role of women on boards of directors; spurious environmental performance measures obscure this significant association. A set of robustness checks and alternative specifications (generalized least squares and two‐stage least squares) confirmed the consistency of our empirical results. This study has theoretical and managerial implications by reinforcing the crucial role of women in top management positions as supporters of environmental initiatives.

Business Ethics the Environment & ResponsibilityVol. 35(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Udine (IT), University of Salento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
19.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Board Gender Diversity Make Firms Less Greenwashed? — Egidio Palmieri, Matteo Cotugno, et al. · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS