Meta-analysis of ERAS Protocols and their Impact on Postoperative Outcomes

In recent years, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have become an evidence-based practice to improve postoperative recovery, reduce complications, and reduce costs in healthcare. To summarize data from RCTs and observational studies regarding the effectiveness of the protocols, especially in colorectal and hepatobiliary surgery, this meta-analysis is conducted. A secondary type of outcome examined included; the length of stay in the healthcare facility, resulting postoperative complications, recovery period, readmission rates, and overall cost-effectiveness. The findings showed that patients in the ERAS group have on average 25 percent shorter stay in hospital compared to those that received standard care. Key ERAS interventions including early mobilization, optimization of fluid and nutrition management as well as multimodal analgesia have reduced the physiological stress of surgery and consequently improved recovery time. In addition, the protocols are associated with reductions of 15–20 percent in postoperative complications such as infections and DVT, common issues that delay recovery and increase healthcare costs. Finally, the meta-analysis also shows that the protocols have a significant cost saving, and the mean cost per patient in the ERAS group is around 13 to 15% lower than in the standard care group, which is primarily due to reduced stays in the healthcare facility and reduced complications. The beneficial features of ERAS as compared to the Australian healthcare system, which was one of the first to adopt ERAS, also indicate a wider range of applicability and a potential cost advantage, as well as improvement of outcomes. The findings of this study suggest that the protocols are a widely effective strategy to improve postoperative recovery and decrease complications, as well as promote cost efficiencies in high-income as well as low to middle-income countries. The findings display the ability of the protocols to improve surgical outcomes across a variety of setting types worldwide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgery and Research
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26502/jsr.10020434
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-analysis of ERAS Protocols and their Impact on Postoperative Outcomes

Chathura Egoda Arachchilage, Kuda Galketiya
2 citations
Journal of Surgery and Research
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
4.01
article

Meta-analysis of ERAS Protocols and their Impact on Postoperative Outcomes

Chathura Egoda Arachchilage, Kuda Galketiya
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In recent years, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have become an evidence-based practice to improve postoperative recovery, reduce complications, and reduce costs in healthcare. To summarize data from RCTs and observational studies regarding the effectiveness of the protocols, especially in colorectal and hepatobiliary surgery, this meta-analysis is conducted. A secondary type of outcome examined included; the length of stay in the healthcare facility, resulting postoperative complications, recovery period, readmission rates, and overall cost-effectiveness. The findings showed that patients in the ERAS group have on average 25 percent shorter stay in hospital compared to those that received standard care. Key ERAS interventions including early mobilization, optimization of fluid and nutrition management as well as multimodal analgesia have reduced the physiological stress of surgery and consequently improved recovery time. In addition, the protocols are associated with reductions of 15–20 percent in postoperative complications such as infections and DVT, common issues that delay recovery and increase healthcare costs. Finally, the meta-analysis also shows that the protocols have a significant cost saving, and the mean cost per patient in the ERAS group is around 13 to 15% lower than in the standard care group, which is primarily due to reduced stays in the healthcare facility and reduced complications. The beneficial features of ERAS as compared to the Australian healthcare system, which was one of the first to adopt ERAS, also indicate a wider range of applicability and a potential cost advantage, as well as improvement of outcomes. The findings of this study suggest that the protocols are a widely effective strategy to improve postoperative recovery and decrease complications, as well as promote cost efficiencies in high-income as well as low to middle-income countries. The findings display the ability of the protocols to improve surgical outcomes across a variety of setting types worldwide.

Journal of Surgery and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meta-analysis of ERAS Protocols and their Impact on Postoperative Outcomes — Chathura Egoda Arachchilage, Kuda Galketiya · Journal of Surgery and Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS