Bonobo Optimizer Inspired PI‐(1+DD) Controller for Robust Load Frequency Management in Renewable Wind Energy Systems

With the growing presence of renewable energy sources (RESs), the necessity for adaptive and robust control strategies becomes more pronounced. This article proposes a self‐adaptive bonobo optimizer (SABO)‐based proportional integral one plus double derivative (PI‐(1+DD)) controller that offers a novel solution to the load frequency control (LFC). It draws inspiration from the reproductive strategies of bonobos, employing unique mating behaviors to enhance optimization processes. This innovative approach introduces memory capabilities, repulsion‐based learning, and diverse‐mating strategies. It is developed to tune the PI‐(1+DD) controller for handling the LFC in a two‐area power system involving a thermal plant and RESs of a wind farm. The proposed SABO algorithm is applied in a comparative manner to the standard bonobo optimization algorithm (BOA), Coot algorithm, particle swarm optimizer (PSO), and Pelican optimization approach (POA). Also, the SABO‐based PI‐(1+DD) controller is contrasted to PI and PIDn controllers. The simulation findings distinguish the proposed SABO‐based PI‐(1+DD) controller as a versatile and adaptive controller offering a more resilient and efficient approach to tackle the complexities introduced by the evolving energy landscape. It demonstrates its potential to significantly improve the dynamic response of power systems, particularly in the face of step load changes and random fluctuations. The proposed SABO‐based PI‐(1+DD) controller shows significant enhancement compared to BOA, Coot, POA, and PSO with 38.81%, 46.27%, 16.79%, and 37.40%, respectively. Also, it demonstrates an impressive percentage improvement of 97.1% compared to the PIDn controller and 74.88% over the PI controller considering random consecutive fluctuations in the system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/er/6874402
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Frequency Control in Power Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bonobo Optimizer Inspired PI‐(1+DD) Controller for Robust Load Frequency Management in Renewable Wind Energy Systems

Ghareeb Moustafa, Sultan Hassan Hakmi, Abdullah M. Shaheen, Sulaiman Z. Almutairi
10 citations
International Journal of Energy Research
Frequency Control in Power Systems
7.30
article

Bonobo Optimizer Inspired PI‐(1+DD) Controller for Robust Load Frequency Management in Renewable Wind Energy Systems

Ghareeb Moustafa, Sultan Hassan Hakmi, Abdullah M. Shaheen, Sulaiman Z. Almutairi
article en
10 citations

Abstract

With the growing presence of renewable energy sources (RESs), the necessity for adaptive and robust control strategies becomes more pronounced. This article proposes a self‐adaptive bonobo optimizer (SABO)‐based proportional integral one plus double derivative (PI‐(1+DD)) controller that offers a novel solution to the load frequency control (LFC). It draws inspiration from the reproductive strategies of bonobos, employing unique mating behaviors to enhance optimization processes. This innovative approach introduces memory capabilities, repulsion‐based learning, and diverse‐mating strategies. It is developed to tune the PI‐(1+DD) controller for handling the LFC in a two‐area power system involving a thermal plant and RESs of a wind farm. The proposed SABO algorithm is applied in a comparative manner to the standard bonobo optimization algorithm (BOA), Coot algorithm, particle swarm optimizer (PSO), and Pelican optimization approach (POA). Also, the SABO‐based PI‐(1+DD) controller is contrasted to PI and PIDn controllers. The simulation findings distinguish the proposed SABO‐based PI‐(1+DD) controller as a versatile and adaptive controller offering a more resilient and efficient approach to tackle the complexities introduced by the evolving energy landscape. It demonstrates its potential to significantly improve the dynamic response of power systems, particularly in the face of step load changes and random fluctuations. The proposed SABO‐based PI‐(1+DD) controller shows significant enhancement compared to BOA, Coot, POA, and PSO with 38.81%, 46.27%, 16.79%, and 37.40%, respectively. Also, it demonstrates an impressive percentage improvement of 97.1% compared to the PIDn controller and 74.88% over the PI controller considering random consecutive fluctuations in the system.

International Journal of Energy ResearchVol. 2025(1)
Suez University (EG), Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Frequency Control in Power Systems
7.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.