Systems Approaches for Corporate Sustainability: How a Certification Program Can Develop and Enact a Bridging Capacity

Extant theory in corporate sustainability highlights challenges in coordinating organizational action to “fit” the complex functioning of ecological systems. Our qualitative study shows how a certification organization in the U.S. wine industry developed and enacted a “bridging capacity,” through which it tailored program standards to cultivate members’ attention to ecological issues within and across spatial and temporal scales. Drawing on data covering a 25-year period, we uncover three mechanisms associated with this bridging capacity: sourcing, decoding , and converting . We develop a theoretical model showing how a bridging capacity enables a certification organization to develop standards that reflect and respond to the complexity of the ecological systems in which its members operate. While certification programs have been important for signaling a commitment to sustainability to stakeholders, our work adds that by developing a bridging capacity, such programs can add further value by supporting coordinated, system approaches to corporate sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization & Environment
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266251325268
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systems Approaches for Corporate Sustainability: How a Certification Program Can Develop and Enact a Bridging Capacity

Jennifer Howard‐Grenville, Brooke A. Lahneman
1 citations
Organization & Environment
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.07
article

Systems Approaches for Corporate Sustainability: How a Certification Program Can Develop and Enact a Bridging Capacity

Jennifer Howard‐Grenville, Brooke A. Lahneman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Extant theory in corporate sustainability highlights challenges in coordinating organizational action to “fit” the complex functioning of ecological systems. Our qualitative study shows how a certification organization in the U.S. wine industry developed and enacted a “bridging capacity,” through which it tailored program standards to cultivate members’ attention to ecological issues within and across spatial and temporal scales. Drawing on data covering a 25-year period, we uncover three mechanisms associated with this bridging capacity: sourcing, decoding , and converting . We develop a theoretical model showing how a bridging capacity enables a certification organization to develop standards that reflect and respond to the complexity of the ecological systems in which its members operate. While certification programs have been important for signaling a commitment to sustainability to stakeholders, our work adds that by developing a bridging capacity, such programs can add further value by supporting coordinated, system approaches to corporate sustainability.

Organization & EnvironmentVol. 38(3)
Montana State University (US), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systems Approaches for Corporate Sustainability: How a Certification Program Can Develop and Enact a Bridging Capacity — Jennifer Howard‐Grenville, Brooke A. Lahneman · Organization & Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS