‘Best practice’ for healthy urban development: learning from others while maintaining local responsiveness in an emerging planning specialism
Lack of clarity about what ‘healthy’ urban development means, alongside financial and technical challenges, has slowed progress on health-promoting development. Case studies could support learning, however, scholars have been critical of their risks when they are applied without adequate consideration of required adaptations or alternatives. We explored how health is promoted through new development via a narrative synthesis of published cases and critically evaluated their value. Cases more frequently achieved sustainability goals than equity and inclusion goals. We conclude that case studies have particular value when shared in a manner that encourages critical examination and discussion, such as through storytelling.
Authors
- Vafa Dianati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-3659)
- Karla Barrantes Chaves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1554-6842)
- Isobel Braithwaite (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5327-5612)
- Helen Pineo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1029-3022)
- Gemma Moore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-4645)
- Elizabeth Cooper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-6607)
Institutions
- University of Washington (US)
- Universidad de Costa Rica (CR)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Planning Practice and Research
- Published
- 2025-03-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2025.2475628
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.35