What Is Valued and What Counts: Relationality, Gender, and Science Communication in Scientific Societies

Feminist scholars critique conceptions of society as an aggregate of primarily self-interested and self-sufficient individuals who operate independently, challenging assumptions of atomistic individualism in neoliberal societies. Instead, they emphasize humans as inherently relational. However, valuing relationality raises issues, as women’s relational roles are often undervalued, reinforcing gendered expectations tied to self-sacrifice and caregiving. Within scientific societies, science communication exemplifies these dynamics, revealing the benefits and pitfalls of relational work. Drawing on a national survey and qualitative interviews with science communicators, this research contributes to feminist discussions on advancing gender equity and addressing the challenges of relational work within workplace contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251321075
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is Valued and What Counts: Relationality, Gender, and Science Communication in Scientific Societies

Pam Papadelos, Chris Beasley
2 citations
Science Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
article

What Is Valued and What Counts: Relationality, Gender, and Science Communication in Scientific Societies

Pam Papadelos, Chris Beasley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Feminist scholars critique conceptions of society as an aggregate of primarily self-interested and self-sufficient individuals who operate independently, challenging assumptions of atomistic individualism in neoliberal societies. Instead, they emphasize humans as inherently relational. However, valuing relationality raises issues, as women’s relational roles are often undervalued, reinforcing gendered expectations tied to self-sacrifice and caregiving. Within scientific societies, science communication exemplifies these dynamics, revealing the benefits and pitfalls of relational work. Drawing on a national survey and qualitative interviews with science communicators, this research contributes to feminist discussions on advancing gender equity and addressing the challenges of relational work within workplace contexts.

Science CommunicationVol. 48(2)
The University of Adelaide (AU)
University of Adelaide
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Is Valued and What Counts: Relationality, Gender, and Science Communication in Scientific Societies — Pam Papadelos, Chris Beasley · Science Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS