Iran’s Proxy Strategy: Militant Networks and Regional Influence in the Middle East

The paper examines Iran’s proxy forces and their role in shaping regional foreign policy and security dynamics in the Middle East. It highlights how Iran has historically leveraged these militias, particularly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, to project power and influence while minimizing direct military involvement. The study identifies key proxy groups, such as Hezbollah, the Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen, analyzing their operational strategies and implications for regional stability. It argues that these proxy forces serve as crucial instruments for Iran, enabling it to achieve strategic objectives and maintain influence across sectarian and national divides. The research underscores the complexity of Iran’s proxy strategy, which blends ideological commitments with pragmatic security concerns. It concludes that these dynamics pose significant challenges for regional security and international policymakers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v12i1p101
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iran’s Proxy Strategy: Militant Networks and Regional Influence in the Middle East

Abdul Samad, Erum Naz
1 citations
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
4.20
article

Iran’s Proxy Strategy: Militant Networks and Regional Influence in the Middle East

Abdul Samad, Erum Naz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper examines Iran’s proxy forces and their role in shaping regional foreign policy and security dynamics in the Middle East. It highlights how Iran has historically leveraged these militias, particularly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, to project power and influence while minimizing direct military involvement. The study identifies key proxy groups, such as Hezbollah, the Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen, analyzing their operational strategies and implications for regional stability. It argues that these proxy forces serve as crucial instruments for Iran, enabling it to achieve strategic objectives and maintain influence across sectarian and national divides. The research underscores the complexity of Iran’s proxy strategy, which blends ideological commitments with pragmatic security concerns. It concludes that these dynamics pose significant challenges for regional security and international policymakers.

International Journal of Humanities and Social ScienceVol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.