More than Connecting the Gender Dots: Exploring a Deep Relations Approach in Environmental Peacebuilding

This article proposes a paradigm shift in environmental peacebuilding beyond the peaceful distribution of resources, cooperative approaches and integrative frameworks and offers a feminist-relational approach that puts relations between men and women, communities and ecosystems at the centre of peacebuilding. Three disconnects mark environmental peacebuilding currently. Firstly, cooperation remains largely between state or elite actors. Secondly, environmental peacebuilding neglects gender and the differential impacts of climate-induced conflict, where women more frequently experience food insecurity, gender-based violence and increased care work. Lastly, when gender is included, it is conflated with women who are simply added to human rights-based frameworks without addressing power imbalances. In contrast, a deep relational approach foregrounds the historical-political situatedness, quality, effects and pluriversality of relations rather than actors. To challenge the actor-centric nature of environmental peacebuilding, I draw on African and indigenous feminist perspectives and a case study of the Karamoja Cluster (in Uganda and Kenya specifically) to illustrate why contexts where gender roles, cattle-rustling, climate crises and conflict intersect should be read through a deep relational lens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251328079
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More than Connecting the Gender Dots: Exploring a Deep Relations Approach in Environmental Peacebuilding

Heidi Hudson
Alternatives Global Local Political
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

More than Connecting the Gender Dots: Exploring a Deep Relations Approach in Environmental Peacebuilding

Heidi Hudson
article en

Abstract

This article proposes a paradigm shift in environmental peacebuilding beyond the peaceful distribution of resources, cooperative approaches and integrative frameworks and offers a feminist-relational approach that puts relations between men and women, communities and ecosystems at the centre of peacebuilding. Three disconnects mark environmental peacebuilding currently. Firstly, cooperation remains largely between state or elite actors. Secondly, environmental peacebuilding neglects gender and the differential impacts of climate-induced conflict, where women more frequently experience food insecurity, gender-based violence and increased care work. Lastly, when gender is included, it is conflated with women who are simply added to human rights-based frameworks without addressing power imbalances. In contrast, a deep relational approach foregrounds the historical-political situatedness, quality, effects and pluriversality of relations rather than actors. To challenge the actor-centric nature of environmental peacebuilding, I draw on African and indigenous feminist perspectives and a case study of the Karamoja Cluster (in Uganda and Kenya specifically) to illustrate why contexts where gender roles, cattle-rustling, climate crises and conflict intersect should be read through a deep relational lens.

Alternatives Global Local Political
University of the Free State (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.