A 13-Week Single-Arm Evaluation of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Plus Insulin Degludec for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Inhaled technosphere insulin (TI, Afrezza®) has a more rapid onset of action than rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAA). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Forty-nine adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) initiated a regimen of TI plus insulin degludec for 13 weeks after completing 17 weeks in the usual-care control group of a randomized trial. The initial TI dose, based on bioequivalence, was approximately two times the RAA dose being used. The primary outcome was noninferiority for daytime time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL at 13 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the preceding 17-week period (baseline), 41% of the 49 participants were using automated insulin delivery (AID), 6% a predictive-low-glucose-suspend pump, 4% a sensor-augmented pump (SAP), and 49% multiple daily injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring. Daytime TIR increased from 50% ± 17% at baseline to 55% ± 20% after 13 weeks (mean change 5.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 9.8%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.04), with an increase of 8.6% compared with baseline MDI/SAP and no change compared with baseline AID. Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0.23% (95% CI: -0.42% to -0.04%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.02), with mean change of -0.36% compared with MDI/SAP and 0.0% compared with AID. Participants meeting the HbA1c target of <7.0% increased from 14% to 31% (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Among baseline AID users, overnight TIR decreased by 15.6% when switched to TI-degludec, whereas among baseline MDI/SAP users, overnight TIR increased by 2.0%. Mean time <54 mg/dL was 0.5% ± 0.7% at baseline and 0.7% ± 0.8% after 13 weeks (mean change 0.2%, 95% CI: -0.1% to 0.5%). After 13 weeks, 40% of participants indicated a desire to continue using TI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In adults with T1D, glycemic outcomes were comparable or slightly better with TI-degludec after switching from AID or MDI. TI should be considered as an option for individuals who want an alternative to using an insulin pump or MDI for insulin delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0581
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A 13-Week Single-Arm Evaluation of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Plus Insulin Degludec for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Thomas Blevins, Halis Kaan Aktürk, Irl B. Hirsch, Mei Mei Church et al.
8 citations
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes Management and Research
10.36
article

A 13-Week Single-Arm Evaluation of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Plus Insulin Degludec for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Thomas Blevins, Halis Kaan Aktürk, Irl B. Hirsch, Mei Mei Church, Shafaq Rizvi, Katrina J. Ruedy, Yogish C. Kudva, Anastasios Manessis, Peter M. Calhoun, Roy W. Beck
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Inhaled technosphere insulin (TI, Afrezza®) has a more rapid onset of action than rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAA). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Forty-nine adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) initiated a regimen of TI plus insulin degludec for 13 weeks after completing 17 weeks in the usual-care control group of a randomized trial. The initial TI dose, based on bioequivalence, was approximately two times the RAA dose being used. The primary outcome was noninferiority for daytime time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL at 13 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the preceding 17-week period (baseline), 41% of the 49 participants were using automated insulin delivery (AID), 6% a predictive-low-glucose-suspend pump, 4% a sensor-augmented pump (SAP), and 49% multiple daily injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring. Daytime TIR increased from 50% ± 17% at baseline to 55% ± 20% after 13 weeks (mean change 5.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 9.8%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.04), with an increase of 8.6% compared with baseline MDI/SAP and no change compared with baseline AID. Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0.23% (95% CI: -0.42% to -0.04%, noninferiority <i>P</i> < 0.001, superiority <i>P</i> = 0.02), with mean change of -0.36% compared with MDI/SAP and 0.0% compared with AID. Participants meeting the HbA1c target of <7.0% increased from 14% to 31% (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Among baseline AID users, overnight TIR decreased by 15.6% when switched to TI-degludec, whereas among baseline MDI/SAP users, overnight TIR increased by 2.0%. Mean time <54 mg/dL was 0.5% ± 0.7% at baseline and 0.7% ± 0.8% after 13 weeks (mean change 0.2%, 95% CI: -0.1% to 0.5%). After 13 weeks, 40% of participants indicated a desire to continue using TI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In adults with T1D, glycemic outcomes were comparable or slightly better with TI-degludec after switching from AID or MDI. TI should be considered as an option for individuals who want an alternative to using an insulin pump or MDI for insulin delivery.

Diabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 27(3)
Mayo Clinic (US), Long Island University (US), University of Washington (US), Sansum Diabetes Research Institute (US), Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology (US), Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diabetes Management and Research
10.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.