COMPARISON ATTEMPT OF EVIDENCE IN LAW AND HISTORY

In the paper presented , the author sets out his thoughts in an attempt to make a comparison in the process of establishing and proving facts in history and legal facts. The interest in this topic arose from the research in connection with the monograph „The Treaty Origins of Bulgarian Statehood V-VII.“ Part One, under the title „Is Isperich Bulgaria the successor to the territorial rights under the 448 treaty between the Eastern Roman Empire(R.E.I.)and the Hun Empire“, in which a review of known historical sources is proposed,on which legal methods of research and analysis are also applied. Already in the preface, the author suggests to us the necessity of rethinking the beginning of the Bulgarian statehood and the possibility, on the basis of the newly discovered historical facts, to return this beginning almost two centuries before 681.Some of the issues that arose in the course of the research are shared by the author in the „Introduction to the topic“ section of the report. In the third part of the report, entitled „The Substance“, the author introduces us to some parallels and distinctions along several main lines of comparison in the subject of study and proof for both History, and Law, such as „human affairs“, „time“ and „facts“.