Cochlear implant procedure. Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIOeChCF) and Italian Society of Audiology and Phoniatrics (SIAF). Part 1: cochlear implants in adults

Though the systematic research of scientific literature found a scarcity of randomised trials and an overall poor conduct and reporting quality of primary studies and systematic reviews, strong or conditional recommendations in favour of CI have been formulated for different subgroups of patients. Further studies should enrol a larger number of participants and use consistent instruments to evaluate hearing outcomes, in order to increase the comparability of results and data pooling with meta-analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100x-n3081
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cochlear implant procedure. Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIOeChCF) and Italian Society of Audiology and Phoniatrics (SIAF). Part 1: cochlear implants in adults

Davide Cornolti, Stefano Berrettini, Domenico Cuda, Anna Rita Fetoni et al.
2 citations
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
2.86
article

Cochlear implant procedure. Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIOeChCF) and Italian Society of Audiology and Phoniatrics (SIAF). Part 1: cochlear implants in adults

Davide Cornolti, Stefano Berrettini, Domenico Cuda, Anna Rita Fetoni, Simona Fiori, Michela Cinquini, Sara Ghiselli, Giorgia Girotto, Pasquale Marsella, Maria Nicastri, Elisabetta Genovese, Diego Di Lisi, Marinella Majorano, Nicola Quaranta, Emanuele Marzetti, Franca Artioli, Silvia Minozzi, Eliana Cristofari, Patrizia Trevisi, Diego Zanetti, Giorgio Conte, Gaetano Paludetti, Francesca Forli, C. Borghi, Umberto Barbieri
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Though the systematic research of scientific literature found a scarcity of randomised trials and an overall poor conduct and reporting quality of primary studies and systematic reviews, strong or conditional recommendations in favour of CI have been formulated for different subgroups of patients. Further studies should enrol a larger number of participants and use consistent instruments to evaluate hearing outcomes, in order to increase the comparability of results and data pooling with meta-analysis.

Acta Otorhinolaryngologica ItalicaVol. 45(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Pisa (IT), Cochlear (Australia) (AU), University of Verona (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Parma (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), University of Milan (IT), Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Ospedale Maggiore (IT), Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena (IT), University Hospital Foundation (CA), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Piacenza (IT), Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica (IT), Ambiente Italia (Italy) (IT), Meyer Children's Hospital (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT), Ospedale Martini (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT), University of Florence (IT), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (US)
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri - IRCCS
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.