The Correlation of Legality and Justice: Relevant Issues of History and Theory

The work examines in a historical and theoretical vein the issues of the relationship between legality and justice as basic legal categories, which are reflected in the concept of human and civil rights and freedoms. The basic points of view on these problems are revealed. It is noted that the antinomy of the problem under consideration is that not everything that is fair is also legal, and not everything that is legal is fair. Legality and justice should be considered as a dialectical relationship between two fundamental legal principles, and not phenomena of a different order. According to the author of the work, when considering the relationship between legality and justice at the level of entities, there is reason to assert that they can be characterized as one-order phenomena that have interdependence and mutual influence as fundamental ideas in the system of legal regulation, but at the level of phenomena one can state their obvious inconsistency. It is proposed to develop further development of scientific research and improvement of law enforcement practice in methodological terms on the basis of the principle of “Hume’s Guillotine” and the theory of social justice of John Rawls.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Juridical world
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/1811-1475-2024-12-13-17
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Correlation of Legality and Justice: Relevant Issues of History and Theory

Aleksey V. Akhmatov
Juridical world
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

The Correlation of Legality and Justice: Relevant Issues of History and Theory

Aleksey V. Akhmatov
article en

Abstract

The work examines in a historical and theoretical vein the issues of the relationship between legality and justice as basic legal categories, which are reflected in the concept of human and civil rights and freedoms. The basic points of view on these problems are revealed. It is noted that the antinomy of the problem under consideration is that not everything that is fair is also legal, and not everything that is legal is fair. Legality and justice should be considered as a dialectical relationship between two fundamental legal principles, and not phenomena of a different order. According to the author of the work, when considering the relationship between legality and justice at the level of entities, there is reason to assert that they can be characterized as one-order phenomena that have interdependence and mutual influence as fundamental ideas in the system of legal regulation, but at the level of phenomena one can state their obvious inconsistency. It is proposed to develop further development of scientific research and improvement of law enforcement practice in methodological terms on the basis of the principle of “Hume’s Guillotine” and the theory of social justice of John Rawls.

Juridical world
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.