AUGMENTED AND VIRTUAL REALITY IN RADIOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES

The accumulation of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in radiology is transforming procedural planning, medical imaging, and diagnostics. These state of art technologies offer immersive and interactive experiences, enhancing precision in interventional radiology, medical education, and surgical planning. AR aids with vascular intervention, tumor localization, and precise medicine by overlaying imaging data onto the patient’s body in real-time. Virtual reality (VR) offers 3D holographic recreation of complicated anatomical structures to enhance medical training and diagnostic precision. Despite of proficient benefits of AR and VR there are many drawbacks of their usage in radiology, for example hindrances in the smooth integration with current workflows, high installation costs, and hardware problems. As AR is best suited for real-time procedural guidance, in contrary VR is excellent for education and in-depth image analysis. AR/VR both could be efficient in reducing diagnostic errors, refining strategies for surgeries, and patient outcomes. For amplifying the usage of AR/VR in clinical applications there is need of development in AI integration, user-friendly designs, and cost-effective solutions. To authenticate long term benefits, large-scale clinical studies are essential, while efforts to enhance accessibility will play crucial role in determining the widespread adoption. Evolution in AR and VR has potential to redefine radiology, eventually bridging the gap between technology and patient-centered care. Both technologies can improve surgical techniques, decrease diagnostic mistakes, and enhance patient outcomes. The research and development in AI integration, user-friendly designs, and affordable solutions can lead to the expansion of their clinical application. The efforts to improve accessibility can lead to wide recognition of these technologies, while vast clinical research is required to confirm their long-term advantages. As AR and VR develop further, they could revolutionize radiology by bringing technology and patient-centered treatment together.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62019/0zz6fy70
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AUGMENTED AND VIRTUAL REALITY IN RADIOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES

Shahab Shahid, Mubashir Javed, Talha Nazir, Hafsa Bhatti et al.
1 citations
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
article

AUGMENTED AND VIRTUAL REALITY IN RADIOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES

Shahab Shahid, Mubashir Javed, Talha Nazir, Hafsa Bhatti, Mahmood Ali, Muhammad Moeed Azwar Bhatti, Ambreen Babar, Khadija, Sammar Hussein Ali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The accumulation of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in radiology is transforming procedural planning, medical imaging, and diagnostics. These state of art technologies offer immersive and interactive experiences, enhancing precision in interventional radiology, medical education, and surgical planning. AR aids with vascular intervention, tumor localization, and precise medicine by overlaying imaging data onto the patient’s body in real-time. Virtual reality (VR) offers 3D holographic recreation of complicated anatomical structures to enhance medical training and diagnostic precision. Despite of proficient benefits of AR and VR there are many drawbacks of their usage in radiology, for example hindrances in the smooth integration with current workflows, high installation costs, and hardware problems. As AR is best suited for real-time procedural guidance, in contrary VR is excellent for education and in-depth image analysis. AR/VR both could be efficient in reducing diagnostic errors, refining strategies for surgeries, and patient outcomes. For amplifying the usage of AR/VR in clinical applications there is need of development in AI integration, user-friendly designs, and cost-effective solutions. To authenticate long term benefits, large-scale clinical studies are essential, while efforts to enhance accessibility will play crucial role in determining the widespread adoption. Evolution in AR and VR has potential to redefine radiology, eventually bridging the gap between technology and patient-centered care. Both technologies can improve surgical techniques, decrease diagnostic mistakes, and enhance patient outcomes. The research and development in AI integration, user-friendly designs, and affordable solutions can lead to the expansion of their clinical application. The efforts to improve accessibility can lead to wide recognition of these technologies, while vast clinical research is required to confirm their long-term advantages. As AR and VR develop further, they could revolutionize radiology by bringing technology and patient-centered treatment together.

Journal of medical & health sciences review.Vol. 2(1)
HITEC University (PK), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.