Evaluation of Differences in the Motivations of Elderly People to Use Senior Citizen Centers in Yeongdo-gu, Busan, Based on Old-Age Service Systems

This study empirically analyzed whether any differences exist in older adults’ motivations to use senior citizen centers based on the type of eldercare system, focusing on senior citizen centers in Yeongdo-gu, Busan, South Korea. First, the main factors influencing older adults’ use of senior citizen centers were identified through previous studies. Subsequently, data were collected through a survey. Data groups were categorized according to the type of eldercare system, and multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between the main variables for each type of eldercare system. It was found that the primary age group of older adults using senior citizen centers was 65–69 years, with home- and community-based care being their primary choices. Furthermore, community-based and institutional care facilitated connections within the community, encouraged social interaction among older adults, and fostered intergenerational interaction and social contribution. Home-based care was strongly motivated by emotional stability and the desire to maintain independent living. Finally, participation in cultural activities was common and significant across all eldercare system types, confirming that senior citizen centers play a crucial role in providing cultural experiences and opportunities for older people, as opposed to simply serving as recreational spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063292
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Differences in the Motivations of Elderly People to Use Senior Citizen Centers in Yeongdo-gu, Busan, Based on Old-Age Service Systems

Heangwoo Lee, Jinghao Zhao, Xiaolong Zhao, Jieun Kim et al.
Applied Sciences
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Evaluation of Differences in the Motivations of Elderly People to Use Senior Citizen Centers in Yeongdo-gu, Busan, Based on Old-Age Service Systems

Heangwoo Lee, Jinghao Zhao, Xiaolong Zhao, Jieun Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Eun Soo Park
article en

Abstract

This study empirically analyzed whether any differences exist in older adults’ motivations to use senior citizen centers based on the type of eldercare system, focusing on senior citizen centers in Yeongdo-gu, Busan, South Korea. First, the main factors influencing older adults’ use of senior citizen centers were identified through previous studies. Subsequently, data were collected through a survey. Data groups were categorized according to the type of eldercare system, and multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between the main variables for each type of eldercare system. It was found that the primary age group of older adults using senior citizen centers was 65–69 years, with home- and community-based care being their primary choices. Furthermore, community-based and institutional care facilitated connections within the community, encouraged social interaction among older adults, and fostered intergenerational interaction and social contribution. Home-based care was strongly motivated by emotional stability and the desire to maintain independent living. Finally, participation in cultural activities was common and significant across all eldercare system types, confirming that senior citizen centers play a crucial role in providing cultural experiences and opportunities for older people, as opposed to simply serving as recreational spaces.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(6)
Kookmin University (KR), Sangmyung University (KR), Jilin University (CN), Konkuk University (KR), Sahmyook University (KR), Jilin College of the Arts (CN)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.