Personal Quality of Life as an Outcome Measure of Antipsychotic Drug Management of Problem Behaviours in Adults with Intellectual Developmental Disorders with or Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> First-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frequently prescribed for the management of problem behaviours (PBs) in people with intellectual developmental disorders (IDDs) with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the different effectiveness of these two groups of drugs has not been adequately investigated, especially in terms of person-centred outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present observational study was to compare the personal QoL of two groups of people with IDDs with and without ASD, attending the same residential facility, but receiving FGAs and SGAs, respectively, for the management of PBs. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-two people with IDDs (ten with ASD) receiving FGAs and twenty-three (eleven with ASD) receiving SGAs for the management of PBs were consecutively recruited. The participants underwent a complex clinical and instrumental evaluation, including the systematic psychopathological assessment for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities-general screening (SPAIDD-G), the Wing's handicaps, behaviours, and skills schedule (HBS), the DOTES, and the BASIQ (QoL Assessment tool battery). Follow-up evaluations were carried out after 6, 12, and 18 months. <b>Results:</b> The use of antipsychotics was withdrawn only in 16 cases, of which only 4 were for significant improvement. Treatment with FGAs was associated with more frequent discontinuation, a higher incidence of side effects, and a trend toward a lower efficacy on PBs than treatment with SGAs. FGAs also improved generic QoL significantly less than SGAs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present pilot study is the first to compare FGAs and SGAs with respect to the generic QoL in people with IDDs and PBs. SGAs resulted to have a significantly greater positive impact on QoL than FGAs, despite demonstrating similar efficacy in treating PBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030316
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal Quality of Life as an Outcome Measure of Antipsychotic Drug Management of Problem Behaviours in Adults with Intellectual Developmental Disorders with or Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

Michele Rossi, Marco O. Bertelli, Elisabetta Filomena Buonaguro, Micaela Piva Merli et al.
1 citations
Brain Sciences
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
1.43
article

Personal Quality of Life as an Outcome Measure of Antipsychotic Drug Management of Problem Behaviours in Adults with Intellectual Developmental Disorders with or Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

Michele Rossi, Marco O. Bertelli, Elisabetta Filomena Buonaguro, Micaela Piva Merli, Annamaria Bianco, Maria Stella Vescio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> First-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frequently prescribed for the management of problem behaviours (PBs) in people with intellectual developmental disorders (IDDs) with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the different effectiveness of these two groups of drugs has not been adequately investigated, especially in terms of person-centred outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present observational study was to compare the personal QoL of two groups of people with IDDs with and without ASD, attending the same residential facility, but receiving FGAs and SGAs, respectively, for the management of PBs. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-two people with IDDs (ten with ASD) receiving FGAs and twenty-three (eleven with ASD) receiving SGAs for the management of PBs were consecutively recruited. The participants underwent a complex clinical and instrumental evaluation, including the systematic psychopathological assessment for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities-general screening (SPAIDD-G), the Wing's handicaps, behaviours, and skills schedule (HBS), the DOTES, and the BASIQ (QoL Assessment tool battery). Follow-up evaluations were carried out after 6, 12, and 18 months. <b>Results:</b> The use of antipsychotics was withdrawn only in 16 cases, of which only 4 were for significant improvement. Treatment with FGAs was associated with more frequent discontinuation, a higher incidence of side effects, and a trend toward a lower efficacy on PBs than treatment with SGAs. FGAs also improved generic QoL significantly less than SGAs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present pilot study is the first to compare FGAs and SGAs with respect to the generic QoL in people with IDDs and PBs. SGAs resulted to have a significantly greater positive impact on QoL than FGAs, despite demonstrating similar efficacy in treating PBs.

Brain SciencesVol. 15(3)
University of Florence (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.