Measuring grammatical understanding

Abstract In the realm of first language (L1) grammar education, research on instruments assessing explicit grammatical understanding is limited. This article discusses an Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis on the Test for Grammatical Understanding (TGU), a multiple-choice tool designed for measuring such grammatical understanding, in this case pertaining to the concept of valency and related concepts (e.g., subject, objects). The results draw from 189 pre-university students (aged 14), who completed different versions of the TGU at multiple time points. Using IRT models for categorical data, we assessed item difficulty, discrimination, and response category functioning. Results highlight the TGU’s usability, version interchangeability, and its potential as a tool for monitoring progress in grammatical understanding. Additionally, differential item functioning (DIF) analyses indicated that most test items performed consistently across versions, though a few showed discrepancies requiring further examination. The discussion addresses item success variations, proposing items that might be omitted under time constraints, and examines the value of a ‘partial understanding’ answer category alongside categories reflecting ‘full’ and ‘no understanding.’ Future study recommendations include expanding TGUs to different linguistic concepts beyond valency and exploring its correlation with open reasoning tasks to further validate its effectiveness in assessing explicit grammatical understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogical Linguistics
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.24014.van
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring grammatical understanding

Sven De Mæyer, Michelle Bouw, Jimmy van Rijt
Pedagogical Linguistics
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Measuring grammatical understanding

Sven De Mæyer, Michelle Bouw, Jimmy van Rijt
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the realm of first language (L1) grammar education, research on instruments assessing explicit grammatical understanding is limited. This article discusses an Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis on the Test for Grammatical Understanding (TGU), a multiple-choice tool designed for measuring such grammatical understanding, in this case pertaining to the concept of valency and related concepts (e.g., subject, objects). The results draw from 189 pre-university students (aged 14), who completed different versions of the TGU at multiple time points. Using IRT models for categorical data, we assessed item difficulty, discrimination, and response category functioning. Results highlight the TGU’s usability, version interchangeability, and its potential as a tool for monitoring progress in grammatical understanding. Additionally, differential item functioning (DIF) analyses indicated that most test items performed consistently across versions, though a few showed discrepancies requiring further examination. The discussion addresses item success variations, proposing items that might be omitted under time constraints, and examines the value of a ‘partial understanding’ answer category alongside categories reflecting ‘full’ and ‘no understanding.’ Future study recommendations include expanding TGUs to different linguistic concepts beyond valency and exploring its correlation with open reasoning tasks to further validate its effectiveness in assessing explicit grammatical understanding.

Pedagogical Linguistics
University of Antwerp (BE), Utrecht University (NL), Tilburg University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.