Low-flow measurement of oil–water two-phase flow based on the dynamic swirling differential pressure method

With the ongoing development of oilfield production, real-time monitoring of wellbore flow rates has become a crucial indicator for evaluating oilfield efficiency. However, under low-flow conditions, the sensitivity of differential pressure is insufficient, and existing differential pressure measurement methods are insufficient for accurate measurement under low-flow conditions. To address this, this study introduces a novel oil–water two-phase flow measurement device based on the dynamic spiral flow differential pressure method. By applying external forces to the swirling pipe section, the irregular upstream flow is forced into a distinct “oil-core water-ring” flow, generating both axial and radial differential pressures. The mechanisms behind these pressures are analyzed, and a theoretical dynamic swirling flow model is developed. Thorough laboratory experiments examine the relationships between the dual differential pressures and flow rate, water cut at various rotational speeds, with experimental data used to validate the model. The results indicate that the dynamic swirling method enhances the sensitivity of radial differential pressure measurements, with both flow rate and water cut positively correlated with the dual differential pressures. When rotational speed exceeds 3000 rpm and oil phase flow rate exceeds 0.7 m3/h, emulsification between the oil and water phases occurs, impacting measurement accuracy. Experimental validation of the established dynamic swirling flow oil–water two-phase measurement model reveals that the relative errors for flow rate and water cut are 4.69% and 7.53%, respectively. The method effectively extends the measurement range of oil–water two-phase flow using the differential pressure method, contributing to the advancement of intelligent oilfields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0260550
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Flow Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-flow measurement of oil–water two-phase flow based on the dynamic swirling differential pressure method

Xingkai Zhang, Huixiong Wu, Ruiquan Liao, Dong Wang et al.
3 citations
Physics of Fluids
Flow Measurement and Analysis
2.59
article

Low-flow measurement of oil–water two-phase flow based on the dynamic swirling differential pressure method

Xingkai Zhang, Huixiong Wu, Ruiquan Liao, Dong Wang, H L Qin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

With the ongoing development of oilfield production, real-time monitoring of wellbore flow rates has become a crucial indicator for evaluating oilfield efficiency. However, under low-flow conditions, the sensitivity of differential pressure is insufficient, and existing differential pressure measurement methods are insufficient for accurate measurement under low-flow conditions. To address this, this study introduces a novel oil–water two-phase flow measurement device based on the dynamic spiral flow differential pressure method. By applying external forces to the swirling pipe section, the irregular upstream flow is forced into a distinct “oil-core water-ring” flow, generating both axial and radial differential pressures. The mechanisms behind these pressures are analyzed, and a theoretical dynamic swirling flow model is developed. Thorough laboratory experiments examine the relationships between the dual differential pressures and flow rate, water cut at various rotational speeds, with experimental data used to validate the model. The results indicate that the dynamic swirling method enhances the sensitivity of radial differential pressure measurements, with both flow rate and water cut positively correlated with the dual differential pressures. When rotational speed exceeds 3000 rpm and oil phase flow rate exceeds 0.7 m3/h, emulsification between the oil and water phases occurs, impacting measurement accuracy. Experimental validation of the established dynamic swirling flow oil–water two-phase measurement model reveals that the relative errors for flow rate and water cut are 4.69% and 7.53%, respectively. The method effectively extends the measurement range of oil–water two-phase flow using the differential pressure method, contributing to the advancement of intelligent oilfields.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(3)
Yangtze University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Flow Measurement and Analysis
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.