A Quali-Quantitative Analysis Model Integrating Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Cost–Benefit Analysis for Optimizing KPI Implementation: Insights from a Practical Case Study Application

In today’s competitive industrial landscape, effective performance measurement is crucial for achieving operational success. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are widely used to track progress, but their implementation often lacks a comprehensive framework that considers both financial outcomes and managerial insights. A quali-quantitative analysis model is introduced to optimize the implementation of KPIs in industrial settings, demonstrated through a case study of a Cambodian charcoal factory. By integrating Cost–Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), the model combines both quantitative financial analysis and qualitative managerial evaluations to assess and rank a selected set of KPIs. This dual approach ensures a more comprehensive understanding of KPI impacts, enabling informed decision-making. The results highlight the critical need for balancing measurable financial benefits with qualitative insights, particularly in industries within developing nations that are forced to compromise in constrained environments, and where both economic outcomes and strategic considerations are essential for sustainable growth. Furthermore, the proposed model has universal applicability across different industrial contexts, providing a flexible and adaptable framework for KPI selection beyond the specific case study analyzed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6030056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quali-Quantitative Analysis Model Integrating Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Cost–Benefit Analysis for Optimizing KPI Implementation: Insights from a Practical Case Study Application

Massimiliano M. Schiraldi, Italo Cesidio Fantozzi, Livio Colleluori
1 citations
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

A Quali-Quantitative Analysis Model Integrating Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Cost–Benefit Analysis for Optimizing KPI Implementation: Insights from a Practical Case Study Application

Massimiliano M. Schiraldi, Italo Cesidio Fantozzi, Livio Colleluori
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In today’s competitive industrial landscape, effective performance measurement is crucial for achieving operational success. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are widely used to track progress, but their implementation often lacks a comprehensive framework that considers both financial outcomes and managerial insights. A quali-quantitative analysis model is introduced to optimize the implementation of KPIs in industrial settings, demonstrated through a case study of a Cambodian charcoal factory. By integrating Cost–Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), the model combines both quantitative financial analysis and qualitative managerial evaluations to assess and rank a selected set of KPIs. This dual approach ensures a more comprehensive understanding of KPI impacts, enabling informed decision-making. The results highlight the critical need for balancing measurable financial benefits with qualitative insights, particularly in industries within developing nations that are forced to compromise in constrained environments, and where both economic outcomes and strategic considerations are essential for sustainable growth. Furthermore, the proposed model has universal applicability across different industrial contexts, providing a flexible and adaptable framework for KPI selection beyond the specific case study analyzed.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 6(3)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.