Reinforcement learning–based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management

Conventional computational models of climate adaptation frameworks inadequately consider decision-makers' capacity to learn, update, and improve decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of reinforcement learning (RL), a machine learning technique that efficaciously acquires knowledge from the environment and systematically optimizes dynamic decisions, in modeling and informing adaptive climate decision-making. We consider coastal flood risk mitigations for Manhattan, New York City, USA (NYC), illustrating the benefit of continuously incorporating observations of sea-level rise into systematic designs of adaptive strategies. We find that when designing adaptive seawalls to protect NYC, the RL-derived strategy significantly reduces the expected net cost by 6 to 36% under the moderate emissions scenario SSP2-4.5 (9 to 77% under the high emissions scenario SSP5-8.5), compared to conventional methods. When considering multiple adaptive policies, including accomodation and retreat as well as protection, the RL approach leads to a further 5% (15%) cost reduction, showing RL's flexibility in coordinatively addressing complex policy design problems. RL also outperforms conventional methods in controlling tail risk (i.e., low probability, high impact outcomes) and in avoiding losses induced by misinformation about the climate state (e.g., deep uncertainty), demonstrating the importance of systematic learning and updating in addressing extremes and uncertainties related to climate adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402826122
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reinforcement learning–based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management

Robert E. Kopp, Kairui Feng, Ning Lin, Siyuan Xian et al.
7 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
7.74
article

Reinforcement learning–based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management

Robert E. Kopp, Kairui Feng, Ning Lin, Siyuan Xian, Michael Oppenheimer
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Conventional computational models of climate adaptation frameworks inadequately consider decision-makers' capacity to learn, update, and improve decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of reinforcement learning (RL), a machine learning technique that efficaciously acquires knowledge from the environment and systematically optimizes dynamic decisions, in modeling and informing adaptive climate decision-making. We consider coastal flood risk mitigations for Manhattan, New York City, USA (NYC), illustrating the benefit of continuously incorporating observations of sea-level rise into systematic designs of adaptive strategies. We find that when designing adaptive seawalls to protect NYC, the RL-derived strategy significantly reduces the expected net cost by 6 to 36% under the moderate emissions scenario SSP2-4.5 (9 to 77% under the high emissions scenario SSP5-8.5), compared to conventional methods. When considering multiple adaptive policies, including accomodation and retreat as well as protection, the RL approach leads to a further 5% (15%) cost reduction, showing RL's flexibility in coordinatively addressing complex policy design problems. RL also outperforms conventional methods in controlling tail risk (i.e., low probability, high impact outcomes) and in avoiding losses induced by misinformation about the climate state (e.g., deep uncertainty), demonstrating the importance of systematic learning and updating in addressing extremes and uncertainties related to climate adaptation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(12)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Tongji University (CN), Planetary Science Institute (US), Energy Institute (GB), Princeton University (US), Princeton Public Schools (US), Environmental Institute (SK), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Rütgers (Germany) (DE)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.