The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has traditionally focused on efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. There has long been concern, however, that this is determined by the goals of healthcare providers/payers, not patients. As a result, HTA arguably fails to reflect the overall value of health technologies-including their "non-clinical" or "personal" utility to patients and their families. The use of genomic testing in clinical care is one domain where this problem is evident, as the personal utility of results is often especially significant. As such, there are growing calls for HTA frameworks to adopt personal utility as a distinct element of value when assessing clinical genomic tests. We agree that personal utility is important to HTA in clinical genomics. However, against a trend toward comprehensive conceptions of personal utility within HTA, we advocate for a restrictive approach to assessing the value of personal utility in the case of clinical genomic testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2025.2475015
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions

Gabriel Watts, Ainsley J. Newson
3 citations
The American Journal of Bioethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
5.64
article

The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions

Gabriel Watts, Ainsley J. Newson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has traditionally focused on efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. There has long been concern, however, that this is determined by the goals of healthcare providers/payers, not patients. As a result, HTA arguably fails to reflect the overall value of health technologies-including their "non-clinical" or "personal" utility to patients and their families. The use of genomic testing in clinical care is one domain where this problem is evident, as the personal utility of results is often especially significant. As such, there are growing calls for HTA frameworks to adopt personal utility as a distinct element of value when assessing clinical genomic tests. We agree that personal utility is important to HTA in clinical genomics. However, against a trend toward comprehensive conceptions of personal utility within HTA, we advocate for a restrictive approach to assessing the value of personal utility in the case of clinical genomic testing.

The American Journal of Bioethics
Twitter (United States) (US), The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics in Clinical Research
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Concept of Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Three Ethical Tensions — Gabriel Watts, Ainsley J. Newson · The American Journal of Bioethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS