Features and limitations of recent elastoviscoplastic constitutive models under Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS)

Elastoviscoplastic (EVP) models are becoming more widely adopted to investigate the deformation and flow of yield stress materials for various applications. In this work, we investigate EVP models, primarily the Saramito model but also the recently developed Kamani–Donley–Rogers (KDR) model, under Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS) tests using Fourier Transform (FT) rheology, dissipation ratio ( ϕ ) analysis and the Sequence of Physical Processes (SPP) framework. A detailed parametric study has been conducted for the Saramito model for a wide range of values of the relevant non-dimensional parameters – Bingham, Weissenberg and Deborah numbers. We also compare the Saramito and KDR models for a particular set of conditions and compare them with experimental data for Pluronic F127 hydrogel, a yield stress fluid commonly used in 3D printing. The parametric study of the Saramito model reveals a universal scaling for the onset of purely elastic behaviour, which shows dependence on both Bingham and Weissenberg numbers. Moreover, we demonstrate that although both EVP models can predict the ‘yielding’ process, the KDR model provides a better agreement with rheological data for Pluronic F127. The KDR also performs better in predicting associated EVP behaviour compared to the Saramito model, e.g. gradual change in the storage and loss moduli and the ϕ values near the onset of yielding. However, neither model could fully capture higher harmonics, shapes of the Lissajous-Bowditch curves and the intra-cycle rheological transitions when compared to experimental data. In addition to the LAOS measurements, further tests under different flow conditions of the recently-developed KDR model against experimental data for yield stress fluids are required to assess its capabilities in capturing the full spectrum of EVP behaviours. • Saramito and Kamani–Donley–Rogers (KDR) EVP models are studied under LAOS test. • FT rheology, plastic dissipation ratio and the SPP framework are utilized. • A comparison with a yield stress fluid, Pluronic F127 hydrogel is also made. • Saramito model shows a universal scaling for the onset of purely elastic behaviour. • KDR model outperforms Saramito model in predicting EVP behaviour of F127 hydrogel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2025.105407
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Features and limitations of recent elastoviscoplastic constitutive models under Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS)

Rishav Agrawal, Robert J. Poole, Cláudio P. Fonte, Esther García‐Tuñón
7 citations
Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
5.03
article

Features and limitations of recent elastoviscoplastic constitutive models under Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS)

Rishav Agrawal, Robert J. Poole, Cláudio P. Fonte, Esther García‐Tuñón
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Elastoviscoplastic (EVP) models are becoming more widely adopted to investigate the deformation and flow of yield stress materials for various applications. In this work, we investigate EVP models, primarily the Saramito model but also the recently developed Kamani–Donley–Rogers (KDR) model, under Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS) tests using Fourier Transform (FT) rheology, dissipation ratio ( ϕ ) analysis and the Sequence of Physical Processes (SPP) framework. A detailed parametric study has been conducted for the Saramito model for a wide range of values of the relevant non-dimensional parameters – Bingham, Weissenberg and Deborah numbers. We also compare the Saramito and KDR models for a particular set of conditions and compare them with experimental data for Pluronic F127 hydrogel, a yield stress fluid commonly used in 3D printing. The parametric study of the Saramito model reveals a universal scaling for the onset of purely elastic behaviour, which shows dependence on both Bingham and Weissenberg numbers. Moreover, we demonstrate that although both EVP models can predict the ‘yielding’ process, the KDR model provides a better agreement with rheological data for Pluronic F127. The KDR also performs better in predicting associated EVP behaviour compared to the Saramito model, e.g. gradual change in the storage and loss moduli and the ϕ values near the onset of yielding. However, neither model could fully capture higher harmonics, shapes of the Lissajous-Bowditch curves and the intra-cycle rheological transitions when compared to experimental data. In addition to the LAOS measurements, further tests under different flow conditions of the recently-developed KDR model against experimental data for yield stress fluids are required to assess its capabilities in capturing the full spectrum of EVP behaviours. • Saramito and Kamani–Donley–Rogers (KDR) EVP models are studied under LAOS test. • FT rheology, plastic dissipation ratio and the SPP framework are utilized. • A comparison with a yield stress fluid, Pluronic F127 hydrogel is also made. • Saramito model shows a universal scaling for the onset of purely elastic behaviour. • KDR model outperforms Saramito model in predicting EVP behaviour of F127 hydrogel.

Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid MechanicsVol. 338
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
UK Research and Innovation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
5.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.