Changes in Models of Economic Agent and Economic Space

The article analyzes characteristics of homo economicus model and space, where it functions. Principles underlying this quasi-natural scientific model are explained in view of physicalism. Arguments are also provided that allow us to make a conclusion about changing requirements to economic agent in institutional economy. Therefore, from the natural scientific position a hypothesis is advanced that new characteristics of agent can be taxonomically included in economic theory to illustrate the actor’s development. Apart from that a conclusion is drawn about the necessity of additional notions concerning space, where economic agent can be defined. The authors provide arguments in favor of the fact that it is impossible to define utterly the agent of economy and space of its functioning by using metaphors only of natural science. A hypothesis was put forward that models of space and agent shall be supplemented by social properties. With regard to these supplements definitions of such notions as formal and informal institutes, organizations are advanced. And finally a conclusion was made about the limited use of physicalism in economics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2025-2-13-24
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Models of Economic Agent and Economic Space

M. Yu. Churilin, T. A. Valiulina
Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Changes in Models of Economic Agent and Economic Space

M. Yu. Churilin, T. A. Valiulina
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes characteristics of homo economicus model and space, where it functions. Principles underlying this quasi-natural scientific model are explained in view of physicalism. Arguments are also provided that allow us to make a conclusion about changing requirements to economic agent in institutional economy. Therefore, from the natural scientific position a hypothesis is advanced that new characteristics of agent can be taxonomically included in economic theory to illustrate the actor’s development. Apart from that a conclusion is drawn about the necessity of additional notions concerning space, where economic agent can be defined. The authors provide arguments in favor of the fact that it is impossible to define utterly the agent of economy and space of its functioning by using metaphors only of natural science. A hypothesis was put forward that models of space and agent shall be supplemented by social properties. With regard to these supplements definitions of such notions as formal and informal institutes, organizations are advanced. And finally a conclusion was made about the limited use of physicalism in economics.

Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics(2)
Institute of Economics (CN), Moscow State Linguistic University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.