Simulation to forecast crime patterns: Comparing space syntax and agent-based models in exploring pedestrian movement and visibility

Space Syntax comprises a set of techniques that emphasize both material and immaterial characteristics of urban space. However, its inherent lack of a time component and land-use variables limits its effectiveness in investigating crime dynamics at the micro-urban scale. On the other hand, ABMs are simulations of interacting agents capable of perceiving their environment, influencing each other, and making autonomous decisions without central control, whose behaviour depends on time and environmental components. Nonetheless, ABMs face challenges in terms of the required amount of input data and model transparency, as well as regards the matter of validation. Despite being based on different modelling approaches – embodying the top–down versus bottom–up contraposition – both Space Syntax and ABMs can qualitatively and quantitatively analyse crucial components for crime analysis, such as flows, copresence, and visibility, deemed key aspects underlying the crime opportunity concept. This paper establishes a bridge between Space Syntax and ABM through the study of crime in urban settings, scrutinising the fundamental metrics that can significantly contribute to the identification of high-risk locations – specifically, pedestrian flow and visibility. It presents two new models, respectively, using Space Syntax methods and ABM, applied to two separate case studies in the historic city centre of Pisa, Italy. It has three objectives: first, to compare the diverse outcomes the distinct approaches provide in terms of people flow and visibility estimation in the built environment; second, to discuss their potential in forecasting risky areas; and, lastly, to propose an integration between Space Syntax metrics for movement within ABMs as parameters to guide agents’ movement. In essence, this study proposes a methodology oriented towards creating a model capable of simulating the relations between people’s behaviour, urban configuration, environmental conditions, and crime distribution, thereby representing a useful decision-support tool for crime prevention purposes and for broadly exploring and modelling pedestrian behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251324065
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation to forecast crime patterns: Comparing space syntax and agent-based models in exploring pedestrian movement and visibility

Diego Altafini, Nick Malleson, Valerio Cutini, Federico Mara
3 citations
Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
3.02
article

Simulation to forecast crime patterns: Comparing space syntax and agent-based models in exploring pedestrian movement and visibility

Diego Altafini, Nick Malleson, Valerio Cutini, Federico Mara
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Space Syntax comprises a set of techniques that emphasize both material and immaterial characteristics of urban space. However, its inherent lack of a time component and land-use variables limits its effectiveness in investigating crime dynamics at the micro-urban scale. On the other hand, ABMs are simulations of interacting agents capable of perceiving their environment, influencing each other, and making autonomous decisions without central control, whose behaviour depends on time and environmental components. Nonetheless, ABMs face challenges in terms of the required amount of input data and model transparency, as well as regards the matter of validation. Despite being based on different modelling approaches – embodying the top–down versus bottom–up contraposition – both Space Syntax and ABMs can qualitatively and quantitatively analyse crucial components for crime analysis, such as flows, copresence, and visibility, deemed key aspects underlying the crime opportunity concept. This paper establishes a bridge between Space Syntax and ABM through the study of crime in urban settings, scrutinising the fundamental metrics that can significantly contribute to the identification of high-risk locations – specifically, pedestrian flow and visibility. It presents two new models, respectively, using Space Syntax methods and ABM, applied to two separate case studies in the historic city centre of Pisa, Italy. It has three objectives: first, to compare the diverse outcomes the distinct approaches provide in terms of people flow and visibility estimation in the built environment; second, to discuss their potential in forecasting risky areas; and, lastly, to propose an integration between Space Syntax metrics for movement within ABMs as parameters to guide agents’ movement. In essence, this study proposes a methodology oriented towards creating a model capable of simulating the relations between people’s behaviour, urban configuration, environmental conditions, and crime distribution, thereby representing a useful decision-support tool for crime prevention purposes and for broadly exploring and modelling pedestrian behaviour.

Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City ScienceVol. 52(9)
University of Pisa (IT), University of Leeds (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
3.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.