Seasonal forecasting of the hourly electricity demand applying machine and deep learning algorithms impact analysis of different factors

The purpose of this paper is to suggest short-term Seasonal forecasting for hourly electricity demand in the New England Control Area (ISO-NE-CA). Precision improvements are also considered when creating a model. Where the whole database is split into four seasons based on demand patterns. This article's integrated model is built on techniques for machine and deep learning methods: Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System, Long Short-Term Memory, Gated Recurrent Units, and Artificial Neural Networks. The linear relationship between temperature and electricity consumption makes the relationship noteworthy. Comparing the temperature effect in a working day and a temperature effect on a weekend day where at night, the marginal effects of temperature on the demand in a working day for power are likewise at their highest. However, there are significant effects of temperature on the demand for a holiday, even a weekend or special holiday. Two scenarios are used to get the results by using machine and deep learning techniques in four seasons. The first scenario is to forecast a working day, and the second scenario is to forecast a holiday (weekend or special holiday) under the effect of the temperature in each of the four seasons and the cost of electricity. To clarify the four techniques' performance and effectiveness, the results were compared using the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Normalized Root Mean Squared Error (NRMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values. The forecasting model shows that the four highlighted algorithms perform well with minimal inaccuracy. Where the highest and the lowest accuracy for the first scenario are (99.90%) in the winter by simulating an Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System and (70.20%) in the autumn by simulating Artificial Neural Network. For the second scenario, the highest and the lowest accuracy are (96.50%) in the autumn by simulating Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System and (68.40%) in the spring by simulating Long Short-Term Memory. In addition, the highest and the lowest values of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for the first scenario are (46.6514, and 24.759 MWh) in the spring, and the summer by simulating Artificial Neural Networks. The highest and the lowest values of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for the second scenario are (190.880, and 45.945 MWh) in the winter, and the autumn by simulating Long Short-Term Memory, and Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91878-0
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonal forecasting of the hourly electricity demand applying machine and deep learning algorithms impact analysis of different factors

R.A. Swief, H.K. Temraz, Noha H. El-Amary, Heba-Allah Ibrahim El-Azab
14 citations
Scientific Reports
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
10.23
article

Seasonal forecasting of the hourly electricity demand applying machine and deep learning algorithms impact analysis of different factors

R.A. Swief, H.K. Temraz, Noha H. El-Amary, Heba-Allah Ibrahim El-Azab
article en
14 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to suggest short-term Seasonal forecasting for hourly electricity demand in the New England Control Area (ISO-NE-CA). Precision improvements are also considered when creating a model. Where the whole database is split into four seasons based on demand patterns. This article's integrated model is built on techniques for machine and deep learning methods: Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System, Long Short-Term Memory, Gated Recurrent Units, and Artificial Neural Networks. The linear relationship between temperature and electricity consumption makes the relationship noteworthy. Comparing the temperature effect in a working day and a temperature effect on a weekend day where at night, the marginal effects of temperature on the demand in a working day for power are likewise at their highest. However, there are significant effects of temperature on the demand for a holiday, even a weekend or special holiday. Two scenarios are used to get the results by using machine and deep learning techniques in four seasons. The first scenario is to forecast a working day, and the second scenario is to forecast a holiday (weekend or special holiday) under the effect of the temperature in each of the four seasons and the cost of electricity. To clarify the four techniques' performance and effectiveness, the results were compared using the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Normalized Root Mean Squared Error (NRMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values. The forecasting model shows that the four highlighted algorithms perform well with minimal inaccuracy. Where the highest and the lowest accuracy for the first scenario are (99.90%) in the winter by simulating an Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System and (70.20%) in the autumn by simulating Artificial Neural Network. For the second scenario, the highest and the lowest accuracy are (96.50%) in the autumn by simulating Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System and (68.40%) in the spring by simulating Long Short-Term Memory. In addition, the highest and the lowest values of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for the first scenario are (46.6514, and 24.759 MWh) in the spring, and the summer by simulating Artificial Neural Networks. The highest and the lowest values of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for the second scenario are (190.880, and 45.945 MWh) in the winter, and the autumn by simulating Long Short-Term Memory, and Adaptive Neural-based Fuzzy Inference System.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Ain Shams University (EG), October 6 University (EG), Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport (EG), Ahram Canadian University (EG)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
10.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.