Developmental Imagination: Teaching Students to Think Like a Developmentalist

The purpose of the undergraduate lifespan course (often required for psychology, education, and nursing majors) might be to teach students to think like a developmentalist. Students often fail to transfer the vast curriculum to their multiple professional domains. Moreover, students frequently maintain mechanistic assumptions, not grasping the essence of developmental science. Lifespan courses should be taught from a relational developmental systems metatheory to reflect current developmental science. This article explains that need, and offers a pedagogical strategy to build critical thinking and inquiry skills. The goal is to equip students to transfer and apply this knowledge to their diverse professional domains and future lives. Advancing the teaching of developmental science is key to advancing the field. We propose five thinking maxims specific to human development that can be explicitly interwoven in the lifespan curriculum to help students learn to think like a developmentalist. These are: Sensitivities vary; combinations differ; risks and protections interact; effects lag and cascade; and context matters. These maxims are supported by developmental science and can be easily infused in the course (e.g. through lecture slides, assignments) to help students complete the course with a pocket guide to lifespan development that they will carry lifelong.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Development
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000545251
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Jewish Identity and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developmental Imagination: Teaching Students to Think Like a Developmentalist

Kendra J. Thomas, Kathleen Stassen Berger
1 citations
Human Development
Jewish Identity and Society
5.59
article

Developmental Imagination: Teaching Students to Think Like a Developmentalist

Kendra J. Thomas, Kathleen Stassen Berger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the undergraduate lifespan course (often required for psychology, education, and nursing majors) might be to teach students to think like a developmentalist. Students often fail to transfer the vast curriculum to their multiple professional domains. Moreover, students frequently maintain mechanistic assumptions, not grasping the essence of developmental science. Lifespan courses should be taught from a relational developmental systems metatheory to reflect current developmental science. This article explains that need, and offers a pedagogical strategy to build critical thinking and inquiry skills. The goal is to equip students to transfer and apply this knowledge to their diverse professional domains and future lives. Advancing the teaching of developmental science is key to advancing the field. We propose five thinking maxims specific to human development that can be explicitly interwoven in the lifespan curriculum to help students learn to think like a developmentalist. These are: Sensitivities vary; combinations differ; risks and protections interact; effects lag and cascade; and context matters. These maxims are supported by developmental science and can be easily infused in the course (e.g. through lecture slides, assignments) to help students complete the course with a pocket guide to lifespan development that they will carry lifelong.

Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Jewish Identity and Society
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.