Conventional vs. digital wax-up: A crossover study on accuracy and undergraduate student satisfaction

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and user experience of diagnostic wax-ups performed by dental students using conventional and digital Computer-Aided Design (CAD) methods. A crossover design was implemented with 105 fourth-year dental students. Each participant completed diagnostic wax-ups using both methods on standardized 3D-printed models, with a one-week washout period. Spatial visualization skills were assessed via the Mental Rotation Test (MRT) prior to the wax-up tasks. The conventional method involved manual wax sculpting, while the digital method utilized Meshmixer 3.5 software for teeth adaptation. Accuracy was evaluated using Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithms and metrics such as mean squared distance, Chamfer distance, and Hausdorff distance. After each session, a user experience questionnaire was administered. The conventional method yielded significantly higher accuracy ( p ​< ​0.001) compared to the digital method. Nevertheless, students strongly preferred the digital approach for its ease of use ( p < ​0.001). MRT results showed no significant correlation between the 3D spatial skills and wax-up accuracy for both methods. Conventional wax-ups demonstrated higher accuracy, while the digital method was favored for its user-friendliness. The absence of a correlation between spatial skills and performance suggests that other factors may influence outcomes. Digital solutions such as Meshmixer provide a cost-effective CAD alternative in resource-limited educational settings. Using easily implementable CAD software in dental schools could allow more CAD training within the curriculum, helping bridge the gap between undergraduate training and postgraduate practice, where CAD is extensively used. • Conventional wax-ups were more precise, highlighting their higher accuracy. • Students prefer digital wax-ups despite lower accuracy, due to their ease of use. • No significant correlation between 3D visualization skills and wax-up accuracy. • Meshmixer offers a CAD alternative for resource-limited dental education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddj.2025.100003
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conventional vs. digital wax-up: A crossover study on accuracy and undergraduate student satisfaction

Abhishek Kumar, Antoine Galibourg, Anastasios Grigoriadis, Cathy Nabet et al.
Digital Dentistry Journal
Augmented Reality Applications
article

Conventional vs. digital wax-up: A crossover study on accuracy and undergraduate student satisfaction

Abhishek Kumar, Antoine Galibourg, Anastasios Grigoriadis, Cathy Nabet, Florent Destruhaut, E. A. Masson
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and user experience of diagnostic wax-ups performed by dental students using conventional and digital Computer-Aided Design (CAD) methods. A crossover design was implemented with 105 fourth-year dental students. Each participant completed diagnostic wax-ups using both methods on standardized 3D-printed models, with a one-week washout period. Spatial visualization skills were assessed via the Mental Rotation Test (MRT) prior to the wax-up tasks. The conventional method involved manual wax sculpting, while the digital method utilized Meshmixer 3.5 software for teeth adaptation. Accuracy was evaluated using Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithms and metrics such as mean squared distance, Chamfer distance, and Hausdorff distance. After each session, a user experience questionnaire was administered. The conventional method yielded significantly higher accuracy ( p ​< ​0.001) compared to the digital method. Nevertheless, students strongly preferred the digital approach for its ease of use ( p < ​0.001). MRT results showed no significant correlation between the 3D spatial skills and wax-up accuracy for both methods. Conventional wax-ups demonstrated higher accuracy, while the digital method was favored for its user-friendliness. The absence of a correlation between spatial skills and performance suggests that other factors may influence outcomes. Digital solutions such as Meshmixer provide a cost-effective CAD alternative in resource-limited educational settings. Using easily implementable CAD software in dental schools could allow more CAD training within the curriculum, helping bridge the gap between undergraduate training and postgraduate practice, where CAD is extensively used. • Conventional wax-ups were more precise, highlighting their higher accuracy. • Students prefer digital wax-ups despite lower accuracy, due to their ease of use. • No significant correlation between 3D visualization skills and wax-up accuracy. • Meshmixer offers a CAD alternative for resource-limited dental education.

Digital Dentistry JournalVol. 1(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (FR), Laboratoire d'Anthropologie Sociale (FR), Centre for Health Equity Studies (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.