A Comparative Study on the Disparities and Performance Metrics Between NoSQL Graph and Relational Databases

In the era of exponentially expanding data, particularly driven by social media development, effective data management and query processing have become critical challenges in application development. Graph databases, such as Neo4j, JanusGraph, ArangoDB, and OrientDB, offer significant advantages for applications requiring intensive processing of interconnected data, including social networks and recommendation systems. In this work, we focus on Neo4j as a representative of graph databases and MySQL as a representative of relational SQL databases for clarity and precision in data representation. We begin by introducing fundamental optimization techniques specific to each type of database. Subsequently, we concentrate on an experimental and investigative analysis of query performance on Neo4j and MySQL databases using original datasets and structures under consideration. The findings reveal that SQL databases outperform simpler queries, whereas graph databases excel in handling complex structures with multiple relationships. Moreover, the complexity of composing queries becomes apparent when addressing territories requiring table mergers (or node and relationship manipulation in graph databases). We also evaluate related research in this area, which further demonstrates that integrating graph and relational databases effectively can lead to optimal data management solutions, while utilizing both types of databases may offer combined advantages depending on the application requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icecer62944.2024.10920423
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on the Disparities and Performance Metrics Between NoSQL Graph and Relational Databases

Esad Kadušić, Christoph Ruland, Elmin Marevac, Nataša Živić et al.
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
article

A Comparative Study on the Disparities and Performance Metrics Between NoSQL Graph and Relational Databases

Esad Kadušić, Christoph Ruland, Elmin Marevac, Nataša Živić, Imad Buljić
article en

Abstract

In the era of exponentially expanding data, particularly driven by social media development, effective data management and query processing have become critical challenges in application development. Graph databases, such as Neo4j, JanusGraph, ArangoDB, and OrientDB, offer significant advantages for applications requiring intensive processing of interconnected data, including social networks and recommendation systems. In this work, we focus on Neo4j as a representative of graph databases and MySQL as a representative of relational SQL databases for clarity and precision in data representation. We begin by introducing fundamental optimization techniques specific to each type of database. Subsequently, we concentrate on an experimental and investigative analysis of query performance on Neo4j and MySQL databases using original datasets and structures under consideration. The findings reveal that SQL databases outperform simpler queries, whereas graph databases excel in handling complex structures with multiple relationships. Moreover, the complexity of composing queries becomes apparent when addressing territories requiring table mergers (or node and relationship manipulation in graph databases). We also evaluate related research in this area, which further demonstrates that integrating graph and relational databases effectively can lead to optimal data management solutions, while utilizing both types of databases may offer combined advantages depending on the application requirements.

University of Sarajevo (BA), Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Zenica (BA), University of Siegen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study on the Disparities and Performance Metrics Between NoSQL Graph and Relational Databases — Esad Kadušić, Christoph Ruland, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS