Control allocation problem transformation approaches for over-actuated vectored thrust VTOLs

One main challenge of vectored thrust VTOLs is actuator thrust control saturation because it may lead to undesired behaviour and loss of control if the control channels are not prioritised. Another challenge of vectored thrust VTOLs is that the vectored thrust results in non-linear effector mapping preventing the direct use of standard linear control allocation approaches. Linear control allocation approaches have lower online computational and complexity burden, and have simplier requirements for fault tolerance and reconfigurability than nonlinear control allocation approaches. This paper proposes three real-time control allocation approaches for transforming a nonlinear control allocation problem to a linear problem so that classical linear control allocation approaches can then be used. The approaches which addresses the two main challenges of the particular VTOL configuration are then tested using three selected flight test manoeuvres on a generic over-actuated vectored thrust three degrees of freedom planar VTOL with no aerodynamics. The first approach transfers the non-linearity from the effector mapping to the computation of the actuator limits by formulating the real controls in cartesian form and then converts the physical actuator limits from polar to cartesian form. The second approach transforms the non-linear effector mapping to a linear mapping via numerical linearisation of the non-linear effector mapping in real-time. The third approach is similar to second approach except an extra step which transforms the virtual controls from cartesian to polar before performing an analytical linearisation resulting in a different and more complicated linear Effector mapping. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control allocation schemes to allocate remaining control authority to higher priority and critical control channels in order to maintain operational safety and stability during certain flight conditions while there is limited control authority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace Science and Technology
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110145
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Control allocation problem transformation approaches for over-actuated vectored thrust VTOLs

Linghai Lu, James F. Whidborne, Emmanuel Enenakpogbe
4 citations
Aerospace Science and Technology
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
3.64
article

Control allocation problem transformation approaches for over-actuated vectored thrust VTOLs

Linghai Lu, James F. Whidborne, Emmanuel Enenakpogbe
article en
4 citations

Abstract

One main challenge of vectored thrust VTOLs is actuator thrust control saturation because it may lead to undesired behaviour and loss of control if the control channels are not prioritised. Another challenge of vectored thrust VTOLs is that the vectored thrust results in non-linear effector mapping preventing the direct use of standard linear control allocation approaches. Linear control allocation approaches have lower online computational and complexity burden, and have simplier requirements for fault tolerance and reconfigurability than nonlinear control allocation approaches. This paper proposes three real-time control allocation approaches for transforming a nonlinear control allocation problem to a linear problem so that classical linear control allocation approaches can then be used. The approaches which addresses the two main challenges of the particular VTOL configuration are then tested using three selected flight test manoeuvres on a generic over-actuated vectored thrust three degrees of freedom planar VTOL with no aerodynamics. The first approach transfers the non-linearity from the effector mapping to the computation of the actuator limits by formulating the real controls in cartesian form and then converts the physical actuator limits from polar to cartesian form. The second approach transforms the non-linear effector mapping to a linear mapping via numerical linearisation of the non-linear effector mapping in real-time. The third approach is similar to second approach except an extra step which transforms the virtual controls from cartesian to polar before performing an analytical linearisation resulting in a different and more complicated linear Effector mapping. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control allocation schemes to allocate remaining control authority to higher priority and critical control channels in order to maintain operational safety and stability during certain flight conditions while there is limited control authority.

Aerospace Science and TechnologyVol. 161
Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology (US), Cranfield University (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
3.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.