Revisiting Stochastic Multi-Level Compositional Optimization

This paper explores stochastic multi-level compositional optimization, where the objective function is a composition of multiple smooth functions. Traditional methods for solving this problem suffer from either sub-optimal sample complexities or require huge batch sizes. To address these limitations, we introduce the Stochastic Multi-level Variance Reduction (SMVR) method. In the expectation case, our SMVR method attains the optimal sample complexity of $\mathcal {O}(1/\epsilon ^{3})$O(1/ε3) to find an $\epsilon$ε-stationary point for non-convex objectives. When the function satisfies convexity or the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) condition, we propose a stage-wise SMVR variant. This variant improves the sample complexity to $\mathcal {O}(1/\epsilon ^{2})$O(1/ε2) for convex functions and $\mathcal {O}(1/(\mu \epsilon ))$O(1/(με)) for functions meeting the $\mu$μ-PL condition or $\mu$μ-strong convexity. These complexities match the lower bounds not only in terms of $\epsilon$ε but also in terms of $\mu$μ (for PL or strongly convex functions), without relying on large batch sizes in each iteration. Furthermore, in the finite-sum case, we develop the SMVR-FS algorithm, which can achieve a complexity of $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{n}/\epsilon ^{2})$O(n/ε2) for non-convex objectives, $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{n}/\epsilon \log (1/\epsilon ))$O(n/εlog(1/ε)) for convex functions and $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{n}/\mu \log (1/\epsilon ))$O(n/μlog(1/ε)) for objectives satisfying the $\mu$μ-PL condition, where $n$n denotes the number of functions in each level. To make use of adaptive learning rates, we propose the Adaptive SMVR method, which maintains the same complexities while demonstrating faster convergence in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2025.3552197
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Stochastic Multi-Level Compositional Optimization

Wei Jiang, Tianbao Yang, Lijun Zhang, Sifan Yang et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
article

Revisiting Stochastic Multi-Level Compositional Optimization

Wei Jiang, Tianbao Yang, Lijun Zhang, Sifan Yang, Yibo Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper explores stochastic multi-level compositional optimization, where the objective function is a composition of multiple smooth functions. Traditional methods for solving this problem suffer from either sub-optimal sample complexities or require huge batch sizes. To address these limitations, we introduce the Stochastic Multi-level Variance Reduction (SMVR) method. In the expectation case, our SMVR method attains the optimal sample complexity of $\mathcal {O}(1/\epsilon ^{3})$O(1/ε3) to find an $\epsilon$ε-stationary point for non-convex objectives. When the function satisfies convexity or the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) condition, we propose a stage-wise SMVR variant. This variant improves the sample complexity to $\mathcal {O}(1/\epsilon ^{2})$O(1/ε2) for convex functions and $\mathcal {O}(1/(\mu \epsilon ))$O(1/(με)) for functions meeting the $\mu$μ-PL condition or $\mu$μ-strong convexity. These complexities match the lower bounds not only in terms of $\epsilon$ε but also in terms of $\mu$μ (for PL or strongly convex functions), without relying on large batch sizes in each iteration. Furthermore, in the finite-sum case, we develop the SMVR-FS algorithm, which can achieve a complexity of $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{n}/\epsilon ^{2})$O(n/ε2) for non-convex objectives, $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{n}/\epsilon \log (1/\epsilon ))$O(n/εlog(1/ε)) for convex functions and $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{n}/\mu \log (1/\epsilon ))$O(n/μlog(1/ε)) for objectives satisfying the $\mu$μ-PL condition, where $n$n denotes the number of functions in each level. To make use of adaptive learning rates, we propose the Adaptive SMVR method, which maintains the same complexities while demonstrating faster convergence in practice.

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceVol. 47(7)
Nanjing University of Industry Technology (CN), Nanjing University (CN), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.