A comprehensive analysis of forest restoration practices across Europe: Ecological, economic, social and policy dimensions

• We provide a first-ever comprehensive view of EU ecosystems and restoration efforts. • Our analysis shows a strong link between restoration goals and geographical zones. • Over 40% of respondents focused restoration on increasing species and promoting regeneration. • Restoration monitoring should consider ecological, socio-economic, and policy factors. • Considering ecosystems’ complexity, a set of harmonized indicators needs to be considered. Scaling up ecosystem restoration is essential to halt and reverse land degradation and biodiversity loss and ensure future functionality and resilience. However, the implementation of concrete restoration initiatives will present many challenges, such as setting appropriate and realistic goals, selecting or developing the most effective and efficient restoration practices, as well as carrying out effective short- and long-term monitoring of success. Furthermore, there is a lack of information to facilitate the implementation of effective restoration interventions. To address this knowledge gap we gathered information on the ecological, economic, social and policy challenges faced by restoration practitioners across Europe using a widely distributed online survey. Based on the 398 responses received from practitioners working in 31 countries we assessed how practical and scientific knowledge form an integral part of restoration initiatives. The focus of more than 40% of respondents from restoration projects was on increasing the population of species (plant species) and promoting their regeneration. Two common elements emerged across the wide diversity of responses: 1) a prevalent belief that restoration enhances multiple ecological aspects simultaneously, and subsequently, 2) the importance of developing monitoring frameworks that holistically evaluate restoration effectiveness, given the difficulty in defining a single, exclusive indicator of restoration success, as this could oversimplify the outcomes in complex ecosystems. Furthermore, respondents emphasized the importance of taking a holistic approach to restoration design, encompassing not only ecological aspects but also social, economic, and policy dimensions. The findings from the analysis of this survey provide, for the first time, a comprehensive view of the ecosystems and restoration activities that European countries are prioritizing, along with evaluation by the stakeholders involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113348
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive analysis of forest restoration practices across Europe: Ecological, economic, social and policy dimensions

María Menéndez‐Miguélez, Katrina Kremer, Jürgen Bauhus, Maitane Erdozain et al.
4 citations
Ecological Indicators
Forest Management and Policy
4.42
article

A comprehensive analysis of forest restoration practices across Europe: Ecological, economic, social and policy dimensions

María Menéndez‐Miguélez, Katrina Kremer, Jürgen Bauhus, Maitane Erdozain, Katharina Lapin, Álvaro Rubio‐Cuadrado, Thomas Lundhede, Metodi Sotirov, L. Werden, Thomas Ward Crowther, Sergio de‐Miguel, Isabel Cañellas, Icíar Alberdi, J. Hoffmann, Surrey W. L. Jacobs, Elisabeth Schatzdorfer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• We provide a first-ever comprehensive view of EU ecosystems and restoration efforts. • Our analysis shows a strong link between restoration goals and geographical zones. • Over 40% of respondents focused restoration on increasing species and promoting regeneration. • Restoration monitoring should consider ecological, socio-economic, and policy factors. • Considering ecosystems’ complexity, a set of harmonized indicators needs to be considered. Scaling up ecosystem restoration is essential to halt and reverse land degradation and biodiversity loss and ensure future functionality and resilience. However, the implementation of concrete restoration initiatives will present many challenges, such as setting appropriate and realistic goals, selecting or developing the most effective and efficient restoration practices, as well as carrying out effective short- and long-term monitoring of success. Furthermore, there is a lack of information to facilitate the implementation of effective restoration interventions. To address this knowledge gap we gathered information on the ecological, economic, social and policy challenges faced by restoration practitioners across Europe using a widely distributed online survey. Based on the 398 responses received from practitioners working in 31 countries we assessed how practical and scientific knowledge form an integral part of restoration initiatives. The focus of more than 40% of respondents from restoration projects was on increasing the population of species (plant species) and promoting their regeneration. Two common elements emerged across the wide diversity of responses: 1) a prevalent belief that restoration enhances multiple ecological aspects simultaneously, and subsequently, 2) the importance of developing monitoring frameworks that holistically evaluate restoration effectiveness, given the difficulty in defining a single, exclusive indicator of restoration success, as this could oversimplify the outcomes in complex ecosystems. Furthermore, respondents emphasized the importance of taking a holistic approach to restoration design, encompassing not only ecological aspects but also social, economic, and policy dimensions. The findings from the analysis of this survey provide, for the first time, a comprehensive view of the ecosystems and restoration activities that European countries are prioritizing, along with evaluation by the stakeholders involved.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 173
University of Copenhagen (DK), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Universitat de Lleida (ES), University of Freiburg (DE), Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology (CH), Department of Environment and Natural Resources (PH), Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (ES), European Forest Institute (DE), Austrian Research Centre for Forests (AT), University of Pretoria (ZA), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Forest Management and Policy
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.