“They Just Don’t Get Around to It”

Lung cancer screening (LCS) rates are low across the United States, with substantial disparities in availability and uptake. This trend is also reflected in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. We aimed to understand clinician perspectives on factors leading to low uptake and racial disparities in LCS. What are VA primary care providers' and LCS program staff's experiences with the LCS process and their perspectives on ways it could be improved to reduce disparities in LCS rates among Black veterans? Semistructured interviews were conducted at a Southeastern US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System with primary care providers and LCS program staff. Interview questions and notetaking templates were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to assess perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors leading to low uptake and racial disparities in LCS to help inform future interventions. We interviewed 20 health care providers (17 primary care providers, 3 LCS program staff). Six emergent themes were derived from a combination of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains and constructs. These included the following: (1) primary care providers’ complex experiences with the centralized LCS program, (2) LCS is 1 priority among many, (3) marked clinician variation in LCS shared decision-making and referral decisions, (4) racial biases and structural inequities, (5) limited clinician knowledge of patient-level screening facilitators, and (6) suggested program improvements. Themes underscored that improving the shared decision-making process and streamlining referral and scheduling are key areas for future interventions to improve LCS uptake. Providers reported multiple barriers contributing to LCS disparities and suggested targeting interventions to improve the shared decision-making process and the transition from primary care to LCS visit. Future studies should evaluate such interventions and their impact on LCS uptake and equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CHEST Pulmonary
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100165
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“They Just Don’t Get Around to It”

Angela Beumer Johnson, Neelima Navuluri, Abigail Shapiro, Isaretta Riley et al.
1 citations
CHEST Pulmonary
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
1.05
article

“They Just Don’t Get Around to It”

Angela Beumer Johnson, Neelima Navuluri, Abigail Shapiro, Isaretta Riley, Christopher E. Cox, Tiera Lanford, Leah L. Zullig, Govind Krishnan, Scott Shofer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lung cancer screening (LCS) rates are low across the United States, with substantial disparities in availability and uptake. This trend is also reflected in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. We aimed to understand clinician perspectives on factors leading to low uptake and racial disparities in LCS. What are VA primary care providers' and LCS program staff's experiences with the LCS process and their perspectives on ways it could be improved to reduce disparities in LCS rates among Black veterans? Semistructured interviews were conducted at a Southeastern US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System with primary care providers and LCS program staff. Interview questions and notetaking templates were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to assess perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors leading to low uptake and racial disparities in LCS to help inform future interventions. We interviewed 20 health care providers (17 primary care providers, 3 LCS program staff). Six emergent themes were derived from a combination of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains and constructs. These included the following: (1) primary care providers’ complex experiences with the centralized LCS program, (2) LCS is 1 priority among many, (3) marked clinician variation in LCS shared decision-making and referral decisions, (4) racial biases and structural inequities, (5) limited clinician knowledge of patient-level screening facilitators, and (6) suggested program improvements. Themes underscored that improving the shared decision-making process and streamlining referral and scheduling are key areas for future interventions to improve LCS uptake. Providers reported multiple barriers contributing to LCS disparities and suggested targeting interventions to improve the shared decision-making process and the transition from primary care to LCS visit. Future studies should evaluate such interventions and their impact on LCS uptake and equity.

CHEST PulmonaryVol. 3(3)
Duke University (US), Durham VA Health Care System (US), Pulmonary and Allergy Associates (US), Durham VA Medical Center (US), Institute for Medical Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.