Planning for Scale-Up and Sustainability: A Multi-site Process Evaluation Protocol for a Novel Intervention for Survivors of Childhood Brain Cancer

Abstract Complex interventions often fail to sustain widespread reach at a population level, despite demonstrating clinical effectiveness during piloting and trial evaluation. ‘Engage’ is a multi-disciplinary and risk-stratified intervention that is delivered remotely to childhood cancer survivors to promote equitable and improved access to survivorship care. Engage is not a standalone intervention in that it requires careful consideration of how it will be integrated into existing survivorship care pathways. Our study aims to conduct a process evaluation of the Engage intervention as applied to brain cancer survivors (‘Engage Brain’) to further contextualise trial outcomes, and understand what factors contribute to a sustainable, scalable, and successfully implementable intervention. A mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted as part of the Engage Brain type-1 effectiveness-implementation trial. Data collection will occur across four domains of research: (1) planning, (2) implementation, (3) practice setting, and (4) ecological setting. Data sources will include semi-structured clinical stakeholder interviews, primary care practitioner interviews, transcribed implementation meetings and project log, transcribed nurse consultations, study materials, and administrative/process data. Qualitative data will be analysed using both deductive and inductive thematic analysis, guided by implementation science frameworks such as the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, which encompasses the Theoretical Domains Framework and implementation outcomes. Quantitative data will be analysed and presented using descriptive statistics where appropriate. Conducting a process evaluation underpinned by implementation science and behaviour change theories will enable the development of a national scale-up framework and improved delivery of sustainable models of care for childhood cancer survivors. Trial Registration: The Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), https://www.anzctr.org.au , ACTRN12621000590864.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-025-00159-5
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planning for Scale-Up and Sustainability: A Multi-site Process Evaluation Protocol for a Novel Intervention for Survivors of Childhood Brain Cancer

Carolyn Mazariego, Joseph Elias, Claire Elizabeth Wakefield, Natalie Taylor et al.
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Planning for Scale-Up and Sustainability: A Multi-site Process Evaluation Protocol for a Novel Intervention for Survivors of Childhood Brain Cancer

Carolyn Mazariego, Joseph Elias, Claire Elizabeth Wakefield, Natalie Taylor, Richard J. Cohn, Jordana K. McLoone, Christina Signorelli, Skye McKay
article en

Abstract

Abstract Complex interventions often fail to sustain widespread reach at a population level, despite demonstrating clinical effectiveness during piloting and trial evaluation. ‘Engage’ is a multi-disciplinary and risk-stratified intervention that is delivered remotely to childhood cancer survivors to promote equitable and improved access to survivorship care. Engage is not a standalone intervention in that it requires careful consideration of how it will be integrated into existing survivorship care pathways. Our study aims to conduct a process evaluation of the Engage intervention as applied to brain cancer survivors (‘Engage Brain’) to further contextualise trial outcomes, and understand what factors contribute to a sustainable, scalable, and successfully implementable intervention. A mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted as part of the Engage Brain type-1 effectiveness-implementation trial. Data collection will occur across four domains of research: (1) planning, (2) implementation, (3) practice setting, and (4) ecological setting. Data sources will include semi-structured clinical stakeholder interviews, primary care practitioner interviews, transcribed implementation meetings and project log, transcribed nurse consultations, study materials, and administrative/process data. Qualitative data will be analysed using both deductive and inductive thematic analysis, guided by implementation science frameworks such as the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, which encompasses the Theoretical Domains Framework and implementation outcomes. Quantitative data will be analysed and presented using descriptive statistics where appropriate. Conducting a process evaluation underpinned by implementation science and behaviour change theories will enable the development of a national scale-up framework and improved delivery of sustainable models of care for childhood cancer survivors. Trial Registration: The Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), https://www.anzctr.org.au , ACTRN12621000590864.

Global Implementation Research and ApplicationsVol. 5(2)
UNSW Sydney (AU), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU)
University of New South Wales, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.