Research on the Uplift Bearing Capacity of the Rock‐socketed Pile and Failure Mechanism

Abstract The ultimate uplift bearing capacity calculation of rock‐socketed piles in the current standard only applies to the shear failure, which takes place at the pile‐rock interface. However, the inverted cone tensile failure at the top of the rock mass exists might occur under uplift load when the rock socketed depth is shallow. A calculation method for the uplift bearing capacity of rock socketed piles considering different failure modes has been proposed based on theoretical analysis. The proposed method considers both shear and tensile failure modes and is validated through model experiments. The inverted cone failure mode of rock socketed piles under uplift load is identified in the experiment. When the depth of the embedded rock pile is less than 2 times the pile diameter, the height of the inverted cone is basically the same as the embedded rock depth, implying that the rock mass begins to crack from the bottom of the pile. The overburden stress has an impact on the angle between the failure surface of the inverted cone and the horizontal plane. The angle between the failure plane and the horizontal plane for pile with covering soil layer is greater than that for pile without covering soil layer. The calculation method for the uplift bearing capacity of rock‐socketed piles considering the tensile failure of the inverted cone provide analysis results close to those of the model test, and it can be used to calculate rock‐socketed piles with small depth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.3130
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Uplift Bearing Capacity of the Rock‐socketed Pile and Failure Mechanism

Lixin Yu, Shuguang Wu, Sen Li, Yifan Fu
3 citations
ce/papers
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
3.91
article

Research on the Uplift Bearing Capacity of the Rock‐socketed Pile and Failure Mechanism

Lixin Yu, Shuguang Wu, Sen Li, Yifan Fu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The ultimate uplift bearing capacity calculation of rock‐socketed piles in the current standard only applies to the shear failure, which takes place at the pile‐rock interface. However, the inverted cone tensile failure at the top of the rock mass exists might occur under uplift load when the rock socketed depth is shallow. A calculation method for the uplift bearing capacity of rock socketed piles considering different failure modes has been proposed based on theoretical analysis. The proposed method considers both shear and tensile failure modes and is validated through model experiments. The inverted cone failure mode of rock socketed piles under uplift load is identified in the experiment. When the depth of the embedded rock pile is less than 2 times the pile diameter, the height of the inverted cone is basically the same as the embedded rock depth, implying that the rock mass begins to crack from the bottom of the pile. The overburden stress has an impact on the angle between the failure surface of the inverted cone and the horizontal plane. The angle between the failure plane and the horizontal plane for pile with covering soil layer is greater than that for pile without covering soil layer. The calculation method for the uplift bearing capacity of rock‐socketed piles considering the tensile failure of the inverted cone provide analysis results close to those of the model test, and it can be used to calculate rock‐socketed piles with small depth.

ce/papersVol. 8(2)
Chongqing University (CN), Shanghai Harbour Engineering Design & Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.