Application of Improved Combination Weight Determination‐VIKOR Method in Decision‐making under Interval Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

Abstract The decision‐making methods for emergency rescue schemes in hydraulic engineering typically rely heavily on subjective judgments, which can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions. To address this issue, an emergency rescue scheme decision‐making model based on the improved combination weight determination‐VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method is proposed to carry out the comparison of emergency rescue programs more effectively and reduce the subjectivity of the weights in the decision‐making process. Firstly, the interval intuitionistic fuzzy set is introduced to express the expert evaluation information, and the objective weights of the emergency rescue evaluation indicators are determined based on entropy weighting method, so as to get the combination weights of the indicators. Secondly, the VIKOR method is used to calculate the weighted Euclidean distance between the comprehensive evaluation matrix and the positive and negative ideal decision matrix, and based on the distance matrix, the group utility value, the individual regret value, and the comprehensive evaluation value of each program are calculated, and the optimal program is determined by this. Finally, the model proposed in this paper is validated by a real case study, and the results show that the decision‐making model can better quantitatively evaluate the emergency rescue program of hydraulic engineering construction. This method proposed can consider the ranking of a variety of evaluative values, reduce the subjectivity in the decision‐making process, and enhance the rationality and effectiveness of the decision‐making process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.3222
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Improved Combination Weight Determination‐VIKOR Method in Decision‐making under Interval Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

Wen Xue, Mingyang Zhang, Sun Kaichang, Yong Meng
1 citations
ce/papers
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

Application of Improved Combination Weight Determination‐VIKOR Method in Decision‐making under Interval Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

Wen Xue, Mingyang Zhang, Sun Kaichang, Yong Meng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The decision‐making methods for emergency rescue schemes in hydraulic engineering typically rely heavily on subjective judgments, which can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions. To address this issue, an emergency rescue scheme decision‐making model based on the improved combination weight determination‐VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method is proposed to carry out the comparison of emergency rescue programs more effectively and reduce the subjectivity of the weights in the decision‐making process. Firstly, the interval intuitionistic fuzzy set is introduced to express the expert evaluation information, and the objective weights of the emergency rescue evaluation indicators are determined based on entropy weighting method, so as to get the combination weights of the indicators. Secondly, the VIKOR method is used to calculate the weighted Euclidean distance between the comprehensive evaluation matrix and the positive and negative ideal decision matrix, and based on the distance matrix, the group utility value, the individual regret value, and the comprehensive evaluation value of each program are calculated, and the optimal program is determined by this. Finally, the model proposed in this paper is validated by a real case study, and the results show that the decision‐making model can better quantitatively evaluate the emergency rescue program of hydraulic engineering construction. This method proposed can consider the ranking of a variety of evaluative values, reduce the subjectivity in the decision‐making process, and enhance the rationality and effectiveness of the decision‐making process.

ce/papersVol. 8(2)
China Three Gorges University (CN), Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Hydraulic Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.