Healthcare Systems-Based Exercise Oncology Programs: Emphasizing and Speaking the Language of the Clinic and Patient

ABSTRACT Introduction Exercise oncology services are evidence based and aim to reduce symptom burden and potentially improve outcomes in adults living with and beyond cancer. Healthcare system-based exercise oncology programs include exercise prior to, during, and after treatment, but the implementation and maintenance of these programs are not well documented. We aimed to describe five healthcare system-based exercise oncology programs in the United States, including service information and barriers to and facilitators of program success. Methods This was a qualitative case study of five healthcare-based exercise oncology programs in the United States informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. We conducted semistructured online interviews with the founders and other key representatives of each program assessing program structure, adoption, and integration into the healthcare system. Data were evaluated using qualitative descriptive methodology. Results In each healthcare-based exercise oncology program, trained exercise professionals delivered in-person, virtual, or hybrid exercise programs to adults with cancer. Buy-in from healthcare system leadership, clinicians, and administration was key to success. All programs were designed to meet the needs of the individual healthcare systems. Institutionalization of the programs into existing healthcare systems facilitated sustainment. Length and exercise prescription for each program varied, but individually tailored exercise programs with physical or functional assessments (often pre/post) were reported by most programs. Funding was a common barrier. Conclusions Institutional priorities and buy-in from both leadership and clinicians were used to establish and maintain five healthcare-based exercise oncology programs from across the United States. These programs followed evidence-based recommendations provided by exercise professionals within the healthcare system to serve patients from the healthcare system’s catchment area. Healthcare systems exploring the creation of exercise oncology programs should consider institutional structures, provider priorities, resources (e.g., staff, finances), leadership buy-in, and financial support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine
Published
2025-03-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000301
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Systems-Based Exercise Oncology Programs: Emphasizing and Speaking the Language of the Clinic and Patient

Neil M. Iyengar, Kelley C. Wood, Anna L. Schwartz, Sami Mansfield et al.
1 citations
Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
article

Healthcare Systems-Based Exercise Oncology Programs: Emphasizing and Speaking the Language of the Clinic and Patient

Neil M. Iyengar, Kelley C. Wood, Anna L. Schwartz, Sami Mansfield, Pamela A. Hansen, Kim Dittus, Mary A. Kennedy, Anna Campbell, Karen Y. Wonders, Adriana M. Coletta, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Jessica Gorzelitz, Melanie Potiaumpai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Exercise oncology services are evidence based and aim to reduce symptom burden and potentially improve outcomes in adults living with and beyond cancer. Healthcare system-based exercise oncology programs include exercise prior to, during, and after treatment, but the implementation and maintenance of these programs are not well documented. We aimed to describe five healthcare system-based exercise oncology programs in the United States, including service information and barriers to and facilitators of program success. Methods This was a qualitative case study of five healthcare-based exercise oncology programs in the United States informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. We conducted semistructured online interviews with the founders and other key representatives of each program assessing program structure, adoption, and integration into the healthcare system. Data were evaluated using qualitative descriptive methodology. Results In each healthcare-based exercise oncology program, trained exercise professionals delivered in-person, virtual, or hybrid exercise programs to adults with cancer. Buy-in from healthcare system leadership, clinicians, and administration was key to success. All programs were designed to meet the needs of the individual healthcare systems. Institutionalization of the programs into existing healthcare systems facilitated sustainment. Length and exercise prescription for each program varied, but individually tailored exercise programs with physical or functional assessments (often pre/post) were reported by most programs. Funding was a common barrier. Conclusions Institutional priorities and buy-in from both leadership and clinicians were used to establish and maintain five healthcare-based exercise oncology programs from across the United States. These programs followed evidence-based recommendations provided by exercise professionals within the healthcare system to serve patients from the healthcare system’s catchment area. Healthcare systems exploring the creation of exercise oncology programs should consider institutional structures, provider priorities, resources (e.g., staff, finances), leadership buy-in, and financial support.

Translational Journal of the American College of Sports MedicineVol. 10(2)
Edith Cowan University (AU), University of Iowa (US), Rainforest Alliance (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (US), Wright State University (US), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Coleman University (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.